首页> 外文会议>British Geotechnical Association geoenvironmental engineering conference >Comparison of leachate attenuation characteristics of colliery spoils in field, column and batch tests
【24h】

Comparison of leachate attenuation characteristics of colliery spoils in field, column and batch tests

机译:渗滤液衰减特征的比较群体,柱和批量试验

获取原文

摘要

Waste Management paper 26B (DoE, 1995) recognises the validity of site specific designs to remove the leachate hazard to surface and ground water posed by landfills, and thus decrease the problem of "over engineering" of low-risk landfill sites. This includes the consideration of materials in landfill systems to attenuate the hazardous components of leachate before they reach vulnerable ground or surface waters. The process of leachate attenuation includes; physical (e.g. dilution), physicochemical (e.g. sorption, ion exchange), chemical (e.g., precipitation and complexation), and microbial (e.g. degradation). However, before leachate attenuation is considered in the risk assessment procedure for andfill design a thorough understanding of the processes governing the attenuation of leachate are required. Coal mining and associated coal utilising industries have led to waste material often referred to as colliery spoil. Colliery spoils have been used in construction of landfill liners due to the large redundant volumes of little economic use. However, previous investigations into the attenuation capacity of spoil are limited, and due to its inherent variability a large number of samples may need to be tested during material selection to ensure adequate performance. Rapidity of the test becomes significant when comparing a large lumber of samples, which would be the case during material selection in the quality assurance phase of landfill liner construction. The two main types of laboratory test used in leachate attenuation investigations are batch equilibrium and column flow tests. Both tests are used to obtain contaminant retention parameters for use in risk assessment studies of contaminant transport from landfill sites. Laboratory tests are more frequently performed than field based tests due to better control on the test conditions and relative ease of test monitoring Batch tests are routinely used in the laboratory in preference to column tests because of the relatively short test time, reduced need for leachant sample analysis, and better test precision. However, column tests are considered to be more realistic than batch tests in determining sorption parameters since they simulate the migration of contaminants in the field more accurately. This paper aims to discuss the use of batch and column tests for assessing colliery spoil as a leachate attenuating material within landfill liner systems. The results of a large-scale field test are also presented for comparison with laboratory test results.
机译:废物管理文件26B(DOE,1995)认识到现场具体设计的有效性,以消除垃圾填埋场所引起的表面和地面水的渗滤液危害,从而降低了低风险垃圾场所的“工程”问题。这包括考虑垃圾填埋系统中的材料,以在易受伤害的地面或地表水中衰减渗滤液的危险组分。渗滤液衰减的过程包括;物理(例如稀释),物理化学(例如吸附,离子交换),化学(例如,沉淀和络合)和微生物(例如降解)。然而,在渗滤液衰减之前考虑在风险评估程序中,为Andfill评估程序进行了彻底了解,需要了解渗滤液衰减的过程。利用煤炭和相关煤利用行业导致浪费材料经常被称为煤炭弃土。由于少数经济用量的冗余体积大,煤炭破坏已被用于建造垃圾填埋场衬垫。然而,先前的调查进入腐败的衰减容量有限,并且由于其固有的变化,可能在材料选择期间需要测试大量样品以确保足够的性能。当比较大型木材的样品时,试验的快速度变得显着,这是垃圾填埋场衬垫结构的质量保证阶段的材料选择期间的情况。用于渗滤液衰减调查的两种主要类型的实验室测试是批量平衡和柱流测试。这两种测试都用于获得垃圾填埋场污染物风险评估研究的污染保留参数。由于对测试条件的更好控制,实验室测试比基于场的测试更频繁地进行,并且由于相对较短的测试时间,在实验室中常常在实验室中使用相对容易的测试监测批量测试,因此需要对柱试验进行柱试验,因此需要减少途径的需求分析,更好地测试精度。然而,柱试验被认为比在确定吸附参数时比批量测试更加真实,因为它们更准确地模拟了污染物中的污染物的迁移。本文旨在讨论批量和柱试验的使用,用于评估煤气填埋系统中的渗滤液腐蚀材料。还提出了大规模场测试的结果,以便与实验室测试结果进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号