首页> 外文会议>36th International conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering 2016 >VALIDATION STUDY OF SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS IN FLUID AND STRUCTURE INTERACTION AND THE COMPARISON TO BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD
【24h】

VALIDATION STUDY OF SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS IN FLUID AND STRUCTURE INTERACTION AND THE COMPARISON TO BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD

机译:流体和结构相互作用中的光滑颗粒水动力学的验证研究及与边界元方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this research is to validate the usage of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method in solving fluid-structure interaction problems as well as study its advantages and disadvantages compared to another well-known technique Boundary Element Method (BEM). The goal is achieved by 1) evaluating the Response Amplitude Operator (RAO) and 2) analyzing the drifting motion of a 1:10 scaled 3m-discus oceanographic buoy developed by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), using both experimental and numerical approaches. For the experimental study, the testing was carried out in an 8-m long wave tank and the buoy motions were measured using non-intrusive techniques. For numerical analysis, the project used DualSPHysics - open source code - and ANSYS AQWA - one of the leading software widely used in the marine applications -to simulate all the experimental scenarios via SPH and BEM techniques respectively. It is observed that while BEM has clear advantages in computational time and the ability to study applicable range of frequencies, SPH, in addition to its capability to simulate drifting motion of the floating structure, has shown to outperform the RAO predictions from BEM (especially in low frequency region). In higher frequency regions, the lack of experimental data hinders the conclusion on which method might be more suitable, as both have their own limitations.
机译:这项研究的目的是验证平滑粒子流体动力学(SPH)方法在解决流固耦合问题中的用途,并研究其与另一种众所周知的边界元方法(BEM)相比的优缺点。通过1)评估响应幅度算子(RAO)和2)使用实验和数值方法分析由美国国家海洋与大气管理局(NOAA)开发的1:10比例3m圆盘海洋浮标的漂移运动来实现该目标。方法。对于实验研究,测试是在一个8米长的波浪油箱中进行的,并且使用非侵入式技术测量了浮标的运动。为了进行数值分析,该项目使用DualSPHysics-开源代码-和ANSYS AQWA-广泛应用于海洋应用的领先软件之一-分别通过SPH和BEM技术模拟所有实验场景。可以看出,尽管BEM在计算时间上具有明显的优势,并且具有研究适用频率范围的能力,但SPH除了具有模拟浮动结构的漂移运动的能力外,还表现出优于BEM的RAO预测(特别是在低频区域)。在较高的频率区域,缺乏实验数据阻碍了哪种方法可能更合适的结论,因为两者都有其自身的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号