【24h】

Comparing approaches to quadrocopter control

机译:比较直升机控制方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present paper compares three approaches on a quadrocopter orientation and altitude control: the most frequently used PD and PID control, the Integral Backstepping methods and a nonlinear decomposition control. All these methods are verified and evaluated by simulation. The whole proposal was applied in Matlab with the described nonlinear model. The comparison shows that PD and PID control has the slowest entire controlling and has second the highest energy efficiency. The integral backstepping method has the fastest altitude control and the advantage was the highest energy efficiency. The method of nonlinear decomposition was the fastest when controlling the orientation (pitch, roll and yaw). The work offers a basis to physical realization and application of the designed control that will be carried out in the next phase.
机译:本文比较了直升机的姿态和高度控制的三种方法:最常用的PD和PID控制,积分Backstepping方法以及非线性分解控制。通过仿真对所有这些方法进行了验证和评估。整个建议已在Matlab中应用,并具有所描述的非线性模型。比较表明,PD和PID控制的整体控制速度最慢,而能量效率最高。整体式反步法具有最快的高度控制,其优点是能效最高。非线性分解方法在控制方向(俯仰,滚动和偏航)时最快。该工作为下一步将要进行的设计控制的物理实现和应用提供了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号