首页> 外文会议>2015 International Conference on Industrial Instrumentation and Control >Performance evaluation of contemporary classifiers for automatic detection of epileptic EEG
【24h】

Performance evaluation of contemporary classifiers for automatic detection of epileptic EEG

机译:用于自动检测癫痫脑电的现代分类器的性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Epilepsy is a global problem, and with seizures eluding even the smartest of diagnosis, a requirement for automatic detection of the same using electroencephalogram (EEG) would have a huge impact in diagnosis of the disorder. Contemporary researchers went ahead and devised a multitude of methods for automatic epilepsy detection, becoming a reason why one should find the best method out, based on accuracy, for classification. This paper reasons out, and rationalizes, the best methods for classification. Accuracy is based on the classifier, and thus this paper discusses classifiers like quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), Classification And Regression Tree(CART), support vector machine (SVM), Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Results show that ANN is the most accurate of all the above stated classifiers with 97.7% accuracy, 97.25% specificity and 98.28% sensitivity in its merit. This is followed closely by SVM with 1% variation in result. These results would certainly help researchers choose the best classifier for detection of epilepsy.
机译:癫痫病是一个全球性问题,即使是最聪明的诊断都无法治愈癫痫病,因此使用脑电图(EEG)自动检测癫痫病的要求将对疾病的诊断产生巨大影响。当代的研究人员继续前进,并设计了多种自动检测癫痫的方法,这就是为什么人们应该基于准确性找到最佳方法进行分类的原因。本文提出并合理化了最佳分类方法。准确性基于分类器,因此本文将讨论分类器,例如二次判别分析(QDA),分类和回归树(CART),支持向量机(SVM),朴素贝叶斯分类器(NBC),线性判别分析(LDA), K近邻(KNN)和人工神经网络(ANN)。结果表明,在上述所有分类器中,人工神经网络的优点是准确度为97.7%,特异性为97.25%和敏感性为98.28%。其次是SVM,结果差异为1%。这些结果肯定会帮助研究人员选择最佳的分类器来检测癫痫。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号