首页> 外文会议>2014 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering amp; Technology >Degree and type of inter-organizational learning required in strategic alliance's first new product development project: The tradeoff between benefits and risks
【24h】

Degree and type of inter-organizational learning required in strategic alliance's first new product development project: The tradeoff between benefits and risks

机译:战略联盟的第一个新产品开发项目所需的组织间学习的程度和类型:利益与风险之间的权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We draw on theories of inter-organizational learning, social networks, and transaction cost economics to examine two strategic options available to a firm in managing a new strategic alliance's first NPD project. These two strategic options are “benefits-driven strategy” and “risk-driven strategy.” In the first option, the management may encourage its project team to have a highly intense level of communication, and use rich communication media with the firm's partner team so as to reap maximum benefits of inter-organizational learning. In the second option, due to transaction-cost-economizing considerations and the fear of partners' opportunistic behavior, the management may encourage its project team toward low intensity level of communications, and a lower degree of media-richness. Under each option, we identify: the amount and type (tacit vs. simple) of inter-organizational learning required and the risks of partner's possible opportunistic behavior and cost of communication with this partner. We examine the strategic option that would be selected under several conditions and propose the optimum option, based on the trade-offs between the benefits and risk. These conditions are: i) type of innovation (radical/incremental), ii) competitoron-competitor partners (high/low partners' market overlapping), iii) NPD mode of work (separate vs. integrated) and iv) partners with similarity/complementary technical skills.
机译:我们利用组织间学习,社交网络和交易成本经济学的理论,研究了企业在管理新战略联盟的第一个NPD项目时可以使用的两种战略选择。这两个战略选择是“利益驱动战略”和“风险驱动战略”。在第一种选择中,管理层可以鼓励其项目团队进行高度的交流,并与公司的合作伙伴团队使用丰富的交流媒体,以最大程度地利用组织间学习的收益。在第二种选择中,出于节省交易成本的考虑以及对合作伙伴机会主义行为的恐惧,管理层可以鼓励其项目团队降低沟通强度,降低媒体丰富度。在每种选择下,我们确定:所需的组织间学习的数量和类型(默认还是简单)以及合作伙伴可能的机会主义行为的风险以及与该合作伙伴沟通的成本。我们研究了将在几种条件下选择的战略选择,并基于收益与风险之间的权衡取舍,提出了最佳选择。这些条件是:i)创新类型(激进/渐进式),ii)竞争对手/非竞争者合作伙伴(高/低端合作伙伴的市场重叠),iii)NPD工作模式(独立或集成)和iv)具有合作伙伴关系的合作伙伴相似性/互补性技术技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号