首页> 外文会议>2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering >Tribes, boundaries, and intellectual silos: Science, technology, and engineering ethics education in the departmentalized world of academia
【24h】

Tribes, boundaries, and intellectual silos: Science, technology, and engineering ethics education in the departmentalized world of academia

机译:部落,边界和知识孤岛:学术界部门化世界中的科学,技术和工程伦理教育

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In theory, science, technology, and engineering ethics lies at the intersection of these STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields and the disciplines of philosophy and/or religion. However, empirical studies suggest that there is relatively little interaction between those teaching courses such as bioethics or engineering ethics in biology or engineering departments and their counterparts in philosophy or religion departments. An analysis of the professors in academia suggests that most participate in one, and only one community of scholars. In order to address these concerns, the authors propose a number of possible solutions, including increased availability of philosophic and religious ethics instruction for STEM professors and of STEM education for religion and philosophy professors. In addition, structural changes in universities to encourage and promote interdisciplinary scholarship and team-teaching.
机译:从理论上讲,科学,技术和工程伦理学处于这些STEM(科学,技术,工程学和数学)领域与哲学和/或宗教学科的交汇处。但是,实证研究表明,生物学或工程系的生物伦理学或工程伦理学等课程与哲学或宗教系的教学课程之间的互动相对较少。对学术界教授的分析表明,大多数学者只参加一个学者团体。为了解决这些问题,作者提出了许多可能的解决方案,包括为STEM教授提供更多的哲学和宗教道德指导,以及为宗教和哲学教授提供STEM教育。此外,大学的结构改革旨在鼓励和促进跨学科奖学金和团队教学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号