首页> 外文会议>2014 14th International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement >Validation of realistic acoustic environments for listening tests using directional hearing aids
【24h】

Validation of realistic acoustic environments for listening tests using directional hearing aids

机译:使用定向助听器验证真实的声学环境以进行听力测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Assessing the real-life benefit of hearing devices inside realistic acoustic environments (RAEs) has long been desired. However, no verified methods exist in literature. This study compares the short-time SNR provided by two multi-microphone directional hearing aid strategies (fixed cardioid & binaural beamformer) operating inside: (1) a real room; (2) the real room environment generated using room acoustics modelling; (3) the real room environment reconstructed using a 4/7 Mixed-Order Ambisonics system. The modelled RAE (2), compared to the real room (1), incurs small median SNR errors (<;2 dB), although the short-time errors are much larger (up to ±10 dB). The Ambisonics-coded RAE (3), compared to the modelled RAE (2), incurs smaller median errors (<;1 dB), while also preserving the short-time values remarkably well. The encouraging results require experimental verification with subjective measures (e.g., speech reception threshold benefit).
机译:长期以来,人们一直希望评估听力设备在真实声学环境(RAE)内的真实生活益处。但是,文献中没有经过验证的方法。本研究比较了在内部运行的两种多麦克风定向助听器策略(固定的心形和双耳波束形成器)提供的短时SNR:(1)真实房间; (2)使用房间声学建模生成的真实房间环境; (3)使用4/7混合阶Ambisonics系统重建的真实房间环境。与真实房间(1)相比,建模的RAE(2)会产生较小的中值SNR误差(<; 2 dB),尽管短时误差要大得多(高达±10 dB)。与建模的RAE(2)相比,由Ambisonics编码的RAE(3)产生较小的中值误差(<; 1 dB),同时还可以很好地保留短时值。令人鼓舞的结果需要通过主观措施(例如语音接收阈值收益)进行实验验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号