首页> 外文会议>2013 China finance review international conference >Liquidity Premium and Pricing Implication of H-L Spread Estimate
【24h】

Liquidity Premium and Pricing Implication of H-L Spread Estimate

机译:流动性溢价和H-L点差估计的定价含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

By applying the data from 1926 to 2010,this paper presents a detailed examination of the high and low prices based estimates of bid-ask spreads (H-L spread estimate) newly developed by Corwin and Schultz (2012).We focus on testing the liquidity premium of H-L spread estimate.The test also makes comparisons with other commonly adopted liquidity measures such as the price impact of Amihud (2002),turnover,the trading discontinuity measure of Liu (2006),and the quoted bid-ask spread measure.H-L spread estimate has price implication in the pre-1963 time period,which is consistent with the result of Corwin and Schultz (2012) that H-L spread estimate performs better in the early period.However,H-L spread estimate does not have price implication in the post-1963 time period and in the entire sample period.We have a new finding that there is a big difference between the pre-1963 time period and the post-1963 time period for liquidity premium of H-L spread estimate and other popular liquidity measures.
机译:通过应用1926年至2010年的数据,本文详细研究了由Corwin和Schultz(2012)新近开发的基于买入和卖出价差的预估价(HL价差估算)。我们重点测试流动性溢价该测试还与其他常用的流动性度量进行了比较,例如Amihud(2002)的价格影响,营业额,Liu的交易间断性度量(2006)以及报价买卖价差。估计在1963年之前的时间段中具有价格含义,这与Corwin和Schultz(2012)的结果一致,即HL利差估计在早期阶段的效果更好。但是,HL利差估计在后阶段没有价格影响。 1963年时期和整个样本时期。我们有一个新发现,即1963年之前的时期和1963年之后的时期之间的HL点差估计和其他流行的流动性溢价之间存在很大差异保证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号