首页> 外文会议>2012 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing. >Analysis on greedy reconstruction algorithms based on compressed sensing
【24h】

Analysis on greedy reconstruction algorithms based on compressed sensing

机译:基于压缩感知的贪婪重构算法分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Due to the fast reconstruction and low complexity of mathematical framework, a family of iterative greedy algorithms has been widely used in compressed sensing recently. In this paper, we focus on two types of greedy algorithms―matching pursuit and gradient pursuit, including MP, OMP, StOMP, CoSaMP, GP, CGP, etc. The mathematical framework of all types of greedy algorithms is introduced, and all of the greedy algorithms are classified according to the strategy of element selection and the update of the residual error. The performance of greedy algorithms is analyzed under the same conditions of running time, reconstruction error, SNR, etc. The relationship among the reconstruction performance, signal sparsity and the number of measurements is provided through the simulation experiments. The results show that the reconstruction error of StOMP, and CoSaMP is significantly better than the MP, OMP, GP and CGP algorithm in the case of small sparsity or more measurements, but the Gradient Pursuit approaches are much faster than Matching Pursuit.
机译:由于数学框架的快速重建和低复杂度,最近在压缩感知中广泛使用了一系列迭代贪婪算法。在本文中,我们主要研究两种类型的贪婪算法:匹配追踪和梯度追踪,包括MP,OMP,StOMP,CoSaMP,GP,CGP等。介绍了所有贪婪算法的数学框架,根据元素选择策略和残差更新,对贪婪算法进行分类。在相同的运行时间,重构误差,信噪比等条件下,分析了贪婪算法的性能。通过仿真实验,给出了重构性能,信号稀疏度和测量次数之间的关系。结果表明,在小稀疏度或更多测量的情况下,StOMP和CoSaMP的重构误差明显优于MP,OMP,GP和CGP算法,但是Gradient Pursuit方法比Matching Pursuit快得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号