首页> 外文会议>2012 International conference on advanced vehicle technologies and integration >Modeling and Comparative Simulation of Two Control Allocation Algorithms of Vehicle Dynamics Control for a 4 In-Wheel-Motored Electric Vehicle
【24h】

Modeling and Comparative Simulation of Two Control Allocation Algorithms of Vehicle Dynamics Control for a 4 In-Wheel-Motored Electric Vehicle

机译:四种轮毂电动汽车的车辆动力学控制的两种控制分配算法的建模和比较仿真

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper,two control allocation algorithms for the handling and stahility of the 4WD-EV are involved.They are exact direct longitudinal tire forces allocation,weightecl least-squares longitudinal tire forces allocation.This paper compares the performances of the two allocation algorithms by means of closed-loop simulation.Firstly,the paper introduces the control objective,allocation and also modeling prozesses of the two control allocation algorithms.Secondly,in the Vedyna software platform,the closed-loop simulation virtual tests are conducted under double lane change and slalom conditions to analyze the ability of tracking the ideal path of the different allocation algorithms.Simulation results indicate that considerable standard of the vehicle handling and stability can be achieved with both of the two control allocation algorithms.Considering the adaptability to the test conditions and stability of the vehicle,weighted least-squares allocation algorithm has a better performance.
机译:本文涉及4WD-EV操纵性和稳定性的两种控制分配算法。它们分别是精确的直接纵向轮胎力分配,权重最小二乘纵向轮胎力分配。本文通过两种方法比较两种分配算法的性能。首先,介绍了两种控制分配算法的控制目标,分配和建模过程。其次,在Vedyna软件平台上,在双车道变换和双车道变换下进行了虚拟仿真试验。激流回旋条件分析了不同分配算法的理想路径跟踪能力。仿真结果表明,两种控制分配算法均可达到相当的车辆操纵性和稳定性标准。考虑到对测试条件和稳定性的适应性在车辆上,加权最小二乘分配算法具有更好的性能e。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号