【24h】

Blending theory - in the classroom

机译:融合理论-在教室里

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In preparing college students for writing and composing for the world of various audiences beyond the class walls, it is important that they become familiar with meaning-making strategies beyond rhetorical patterns, such as ‘claim-reason-evidence,’ which although powerful, may ultimately rely on literalist assumptions of the nature of language. To introduce the power of figurative language and bring literalism front and center for my especially literal-minded (predominantly) engineering students, I designed a portion of my composition course to complement its ‘claim-reason-evidence’ core, in which students discover metaphor. Students are formally introduced to the trope in the middle of the term and then spend several weeks investigating the nature of metaphor in coordination with ongoing projects. Using Lakoff and Johnson's work on metaphor and a further development of it (‘Blending Theory’), the students put their understanding of metaphor to work by developing and explaining their own metaphors. Though this is new territory in my course, it has proven beneficial to the students' composition skills and their abilities to recognize and critique the non-literal aspects of communication and the assumptions of literalism.
机译:在使大学生为在课堂之外的各个听众的世界写作和作文做准备时,重要的是使他们熟悉修辞模式以外的意义形成策略,例如“主张理由证据”,尽管这种说法有力,但可能最终依赖于语言本质的文字主义假设。为了介绍比喻语言的力量并为我特别注重文字的(主要是)工程专业的学生带来文字主义的关注和中心,我设计了一部分作文课程,以补充其“认理证据”核心,让学生发现隐喻。在学期中旬,学生会被正式介绍到这套底子上,然后花数周时间与正在进行的项目配合研究隐喻的性质。通过使用Lakoff和Johnson的隐喻著作以及对它的进一步发展(“融合理论”),学生通过发展和解释自己的隐喻,将对隐喻的理解付诸实践。尽管这是我课程中的新领域,但事实证明,这对学生的作文技巧及其识别和批判交流的非文学方面和直言主义假设的能力很有帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号