首页> 外文会议>2012 7th Colombian Computing Congress. >Is it captures the cyclical and trend component in the neural networks models?
【24h】

Is it captures the cyclical and trend component in the neural networks models?

机译:它是否捕获了神经网络模型中的周期性和趋势成分?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this article, we evaluate the autoregressive neural networks (ARNN) in forecasting time series with trend and seasonal cycle. For the time series analyzed, we found that the combined application of simple and seasonal differentiation factors does not necessarily contribute to better forecasts than if these are applied separately, and that while the preprocessing of data helps to better forecast does not mean that models are not able to capture both the trend and the seasonal cycle present in the untransformed series. In this regard, both the ARNN as the MLP (used as a benchmark) gave better results than the SARIMA process, which in the case of MLP contradicts what is stated in [15], so the assertion that MLPs do not capture these components applies only in special cases. This conclusion can be extended to ARNN model.
机译:在本文中,我们在预测具有趋势和季节周期的时间序列时评估自回归神经网络(ARNN)。对于所分析的时间序列,我们发现简单和季节性差异因子的组合应用不一定比单独应用时更有助于更好的预测,并且尽管对数据进行预处理有助于更好地进行预测,但这并不意味着模型并不适用。能够捕获未转换序列中的趋势和季节周期。在这方面,作为MLP的ARNN(用作基准)都比SARIMA流程具有更好的结果,在MLP的情况下,SARIMA流程与[15]中所述相矛盾,因此适用MLP不能捕获这些成分的断言适用。仅在特殊情况下。该结论可以推广到ARNN模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号