【24h】

Comparing demand side management approaches

机译:比较需求方管理方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Due to increasing energy prices and the greenhouse effect, a more efficient energy supply is desirable, preferably based on renewable sources. To cope with the decrease of flexibility due to the introduction of renewables in production side of the supply chain, a more flexible consumer side is required. In literature, a lot of management methodologies are proposed to exploit the flexibility of consuming devices. Due to the large number of devices, these methodologies are often based on cost functions. Comparing the results of different methodologies is hard since differences in results can be caused by the methodologies itself or by less good defined cost functions. In this paper an auction based realtime control is compared with an ILP based realtime control using identical cost functions. Furthermore, the influence of planning on these strategies is studied. The simulation results show that planning leads to better and more predictable results. Furthermore, planning is best combined with an auction. However, the auction should slightly be altered to decrease communication and to be able to cope with (local) grid constraints.
机译:由于增加的能源价格和温室效应,期望更有效的能源供应,优选地基于可再生资源。为了应对由于在供应链的生产方引入可再生能源而导致的灵活性下降,需要更加灵活的消费者方。在文献中,提出了许多管理方法来利用消费设备的灵活性。由于设备数量众多,这些方法通常基于成本函数。比较不同方法的结果很困难,因为结果的差异可能是由方法本身或不太好的定义成本函数引起的。在本文中,将基于拍卖的实时控制与使用相同成本函数的基于ILP的实时控制进行了比较。此外,研究了计划对这些策略的影响。仿真结果表明,计划可以带来更好,更可预测的结果。此外,最好将计划与拍卖结合起来。但是,应略微改变拍卖方式,以减少交流并能够应对(本地)电网约束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号