首页> 外文会议>2008 China international conference in finance >Does Financial Regulation Matter? Market Volatility and the US 1933/34 Acts
【24h】

Does Financial Regulation Matter? Market Volatility and the US 1933/34 Acts

机译:金融监管重要吗?市场波动与美国1933/34号法案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The impact of the US 1933/34 Acts, the rst national nancial regulation acts in the world, on nancial markets have been under debates since Stigler (1964). Major ndings in the literature is that nancial regulation enacted by these laws is at best being ineffective to improve nancial markets until some recent studies imply indirectly that they could be effective. By studying daily returns of NYSE data from 1890 to 1970, this paper provides systematic evidence that the 1933/34 Acts have substantially reduced market volatilities after controlling for Great Depression effect and macroeco- nomic variables. Moreover, we show that even when we treat the existence and the date of the volatility changes as unknown, statistically identied structural changes are fully consistent with the above results that the volatility reduction time coincide with the enacting of the Acts.
机译:自斯蒂格勒(1964年)以来,一直在争论世界上第一个国家金融监管法案-美国1933/34号法案对金融市场的影响。文献中的主要发现是,这些法律制定的金融监管至多不能有效地改善金融市场,直到最近的一些研究间接暗示它们可能是有效的。通过研究1890年至1970年纽约证券交易所数据的日收益,本文提供了系统的证据,证明1933/34号法案在控制了大萧条效应和宏观经济变量之后已大大降低了市场波动性。此外,我们表明,即使我们将波动率变化的存在和日期视为未知,统计上确定的结构变化也与上述结果完全一致,即波动率降低的时间与法案的颁布相吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号