首页> 外文会议>2008 China international conference in finance >Latent Liquidity and Corporate Bond Yield Spreads
【24h】

Latent Liquidity and Corporate Bond Yield Spreads

机译:潜在流动性和公司债券收益率利差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent research has shown that default risk accounts for only a part of the total yield spread on risky corporate bonds relative to their risk-less benchmarks. One candidate for the unexplained portion of the spread is a premium for liquidity. We investigate this possibility by relating the liquidity of corporate bonds, as measured by their ease of market access, to the basis between the credit default swap (CDS) price of the issuer and the par-equivalent corporate bond yield spread. The ease of access of a bond is measured using a recently developed measure called latent liquidity, which is defined as the weighted average turnover of funds holding the bond, where the weights are their fractional holdings of the bond. We find that bonds with higher latent liquidity are more expensive relative to their CDS contracts, after controlling for other realized measures of liquidity. Additionally, we document the positive effects of liquidity in the CDS market on the CDS-bond basis. We also find that several firm-level variables related to credit risk negatively affect the basis, indicating that the CDS price does not fully capture the credit risk of the bond. Furthermore, we find that when default risk of a firm is high, its illiquid bonds are more expensive. We also document that bond-level variables related to features of the contract that may be related to credit risk, such as the presence of covenants, have a negative impact on the CDS-bond basis. These findings are consistent with limits to arbitrage between the CDS and bond markets, due to the costs of "shorting" bonds.
机译:最近的研究表明,相对于无风险基准,违约风险仅占风险公司债券总收益率差的一部分。价差未解释部分的一个候选者是流动性溢价。我们通过将公司债券的流动性(根据其进入市场的难易程度来衡量)与发行人的信用违约掉期价格(CDS)和等价公司债券收益率利差之间的基础联系起来,来研究这种可能性。使用最近开发的一种称为潜在流动性的方法来衡量债券的难易程度,该方法被定义为持有债券的基金的加权平均周转率,其中权重是债券的部分持有量。我们发现,在控制其他已实现的流动性衡量标准之后,具有较高潜在流动性的债券相对于其CDS合约而言更为昂贵。此外,我们记录了CDS债券对CDS市场流动性的积极影响。我们还发现,与信用风险相关的几个公司级变量会对基准产生负面影响,表明CDS价格不能完全反映债券的信用风险。此外,我们发现,当一家公司的违约风险很高时,其流动性差的债券的价格会更高。我们还记录了与合同特征相关的,可能与信用风险相关的债券级别变量(例如存在契约)对CDS债券基础具有负面影响。由于“做空”债券的成本,这些发现与CDS和债券市场之间套利的限制是一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号