【24h】

Reverse Auctions: Analysis and Review

机译:反向拍卖:分析和审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As organisations extend the reach of their information systems into the supply chain e-procurement has become a driving force for achieving substantial cost savings. One mechanism that facilitates e-procurement is the reverse online auction. Reverse online auctions are delivered by intermediaries and promise to deliver savings up to 20% for the buying organisations. The rhetoric of B2B collaboration has "win-win" scenarios for all who participate in online auctions. Is this true? This paper will analyse a previously reported reverse auction (Stein & Hawking 2002a, Stein & Hawking 2002b) from the viewpoint of the four main players and question the value proposition of the reverse online auction as a tool in B2B e-commerce. The main outcomes show that the auction vendor and buyer were major winners with the both the winning and losing supplier expending considerable time and effort to participate in the auction only to realise that the. reverse auction places cost above all other factors in awarding the contract. The importance of cost over service delivery, customer support and buyer-supplier relationship is the basis for a discussion of the viability of the auction model as well as a review of the process one year after the first reverse auction.
机译:随着组织将其信息系统的范围扩展到供应链中,电子采购已成为节省大量成本的驱动力。促进电子采购的一种机制是反向在线拍卖。反向在线拍卖由中介机构提供,并承诺为购买组织节省高达20%的费用。对于所有参与在线拍卖的人来说,B2B合作的言论都有“双赢”的场景。这是真的?本文将从四个主要参与者的角度分析先前报道的反向拍卖(Stein&Hawking 2002a,Stein&Hawking 2002b),并质疑反向在线拍卖作为B2B电子商务工具的价值主张。主要结果表明,拍卖的卖方和买方都是主要的赢家,输赢的供应商都花费了大量的时间和精力参加拍卖,才意识到这一点。在授予合同时,反向拍卖的成本高于所有其他因素。成本对服务交付,客户支持和买方与供应商之间关系的重要性是讨论拍卖模型的可行性以及进行第一次反向拍卖一年后流程审查的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号