首页> 外文OA文献 >Building bridges across dissimilarities: Women’s activism in Turkey at the heart of the global/local paradox of human rights.
【2h】

Building bridges across dissimilarities: Women’s activism in Turkey at the heart of the global/local paradox of human rights.

机译:架起跨越分歧的桥梁:土耳其的妇女积极主义是全球/地方人权悖论的核心。

摘要

The debate surrounding the headscarf ban in Turkey has been omnipresent since Mustafa Kemal Ataturk came to power in 1923. After 624 years under Ottoman rule, the Turkish people were offered a new secular Republican nation-State. Ataturk presented his six principles- republicanism, secularism, nationalism, populism, statism and reformism, altogether constituting Kemalism- as the much-needed vehicle for the modernization of society (Karabelias,2009). These ideologies initiated the ongoing search for identity in which Turkey finds itself today- between global aspirations and the local realities. For women, the reformist principle was translated into a ban of the headscarf in public spaces. This ban was seen as an attack on Islamist women’s freedom and access to public spaces such as universities and political organs, and recently some women’s movements in the 1980s and 1990s turned their activism toward ending the headscarf ban. However women did not always agree on the terms of this lack of visibility. For example, both feminist groups working in the public sphere and Islamic women’s groups acting within religious political parties are against the ban, as it prevents women from being represented in politics and limits right as woman (Cubukçu,2009). However, discourse shows that on the one hand, Islamic women do not support the ban because the veil is a fundamental aspect of their religion. On the other hand, feminist movements support lifting the ban so long as the old rule, where women live as men’s property, is not reinstated. (Cubukçu et al. 2004: 2012). These women fight the same battle but do not have the same rationale. Their campaign to end the headscarf ban stands between a global understanding of human rights - including women’s rights - and a local social reality concerning the needs of religious women. The research question for this dissertation is twofold: What is the tension between the local and the global in gender issues in Turkey? What role did women play in activism for human rights in the 1980s and the 1990s?
机译:自从1923年穆斯塔法·凯末尔·阿塔图尔克(Mustafa Kemal Ataturk)上台以来,围绕土耳其禁止头巾的辩论无处不在。在奥斯曼帝国统治下的624年之后,土耳其人民被赋予了一个新的世俗共和民族国家。阿塔图尔克提出了他的六项原则:共和主义,世俗主义,民族主义,民粹主义,国家主义和改良主义,共构成凯末尔主义,是社会现代化的急需工具(卡拉贝里亚斯,2009年)。这些意识形态促使人们不断寻求在当今的全球愿望和当地现实之间找到自己的身份的土耳其。对于女性而言,改良主义原则被转化为禁止在公共场所使用头巾。这项禁令被视为对伊斯兰妇女自由和进入大学和政治机关等公共场所的攻击,最近,在1980年代和1990年代,一些妇女运动将他们的行动主义转向结束头巾禁令。但是,妇女并不总是就缺乏知名度的条款达成共识。例如,在公共领域工作的女权主义者团体和在宗教政党中行动的伊斯兰妇女团体都违反了这一禁令,因为它阻止了妇女在政治中的代表地位,并限制了妇女的权利(Cubukçu,2009)。但是,话语表明,一方面,伊斯兰妇女不支持这项禁令,因为面纱是其宗教的基本方面。另一方面,女权运动支持取消禁令,只要不恢复以前的规则,即妇女作为男人的财产生活。 (Cubukçu等人2004:2012)。这些妇女打同样的仗,但没有相同的理由。他们结束头巾禁令的运动介于对人权(包括妇女权利)的全球了解与有关宗教妇女需求的当地社会现实之间。本论文的研究问题是双重的:土耳其在性别问题上本地与全球之间的紧张关系是什么?妇女在1980年代和1990年代的人权运动中扮演了什么角色?

著录项

  • 作者

    de Biolley Magali;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号