首页> 外文OA文献 >Cycling in Toronto: Route Choice Behavior and Implications to Infrastructure Planning
【2h】

Cycling in Toronto: Route Choice Behavior and Implications to Infrastructure Planning

机译:多伦多骑车:路线选择行为及其对基础设施规划的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This research investigates the route choice behavior of cyclists in the City of Toronto using data collected from a smartphone application deployed to a large number of cyclists in the City. A total 4,556 cyclists registered for this study and logged over 30,000 commuting trips and 9,600 recreational trips over a study period of 9 months. The routes of individual cycling trips were estimated by a map-matching algorithm using second-by-second GPS readings of each trip and Toronto’s cycling road network. Personal information such as age, gender and residence, work or school place was collected from the participants on a voluntary basis. The collected cycling trip data were used to estimate path-size logit route choice models – variant of multinomial logit model for both commuting and recreational trips with various modeling options and combinations of candidate factors. The estimations of the models were evaluated using various performance measures and statistical tests, resulting in findings and conclusions on the optimal modeling structure, the factors that had statistical significant effects on cyclists’ routing decisions and the magnitude of these effects.The modeling results revealed the critical importance of cycling facilities such as bicycle lanes, multiuse pathways and trails on cyclists’ route choice decisions. It was shown that directness as measured by travel distance is the most important factor considered by commuting cyclists in making their route choices. It was also found that cyclists prefer cycling along major streets than local streets and do not mind traveling along transit routes. Furthermore, they tend to choose routes with more bicycle facilities especially dedicated off-street facilities. Comparing to recreational trips, the routes chosen for commuting were in general closer to the routes of minimum distance and energy consumption. In contrast, for recreational trips, cyclists were less concerned about the directness or the degree of challenges of the routes. For these trips, cyclists appeared to place safety at a higher priority instead of time as they showed a higher preference to dedicated bike facilities such as bike lanes and off-street bike paths than on-street mixed facility. Weather and personal attributes were not found to be statistical significant in affecting cyclists’ route choices. These along with other findings from this thesis research have provided valuable information for Toronto’s ongoing effort on bicycle network planning. The results could also be used to enhance route-finding tools available to cyclists for improved cycling experience.
机译:这项研究使用从智能手机应用程序中收集的数据调查了多伦多市骑自行车者的路线选择行为,该智能手机应用程序已部署到该市大量骑自行车者中。在为期9个月的研究期内,共有4556名自行车手注册进行了此项研究,并记录了30,000多次通勤旅行和9,600趟休闲旅行。通过地图匹配算法,使用每次旅行的每秒GPS读数以及多伦多的骑行道路网络,通过地图匹配算法估算了各个骑车旅行的路线。自愿收集参与者的年龄,性别,住所,工作或学校地点等个人信息。收集到的自行车旅行数据被用于估计路径大小的logit路线选择模型-用于通勤和休闲旅行的多项式logit模型的变体,具有各种建模选项和候选因子的组合。通过各种性能指标和统计测试对模型的估计值进行评估,得出关于最佳建模结构,对自行车手的路线选择具有统计显着影响的因素以及这些影响的程度的发现和结论。自行车道,多用途路径和小径等自行车设施对骑车人的路线选择决策至关重要。结果表明,以行进距离衡量的方向性是通勤骑车者在选择路线时要考虑的最重要因素。还发现,与本地街道相比,骑自行车的人更喜欢沿主要街道骑自行车,并且不介意沿过境路线旅行。此外,他们倾向于选择具有更多自行车设施,特别是专用路外设施的路线。与休闲旅行相比,通勤选择的路线通常更接近最小距离和能耗的路线。相反,对于休闲旅行,骑自行车的人不太关心路线的直接性或挑战程度。对于这些旅行,骑自行车的人似乎将安全性放在了优先位置,而不是时间上,因为与公路上的混合设施相比,他们对专用的自行车设施(例如,自行车道和路外自行车道)表现出更高的偏爱。在影响骑车人的路线选择方面,天气和个人属性没有统计学意义。这些以及本论文研究的其他发现为多伦多正在进行的自行车网络规划工作提供了有价值的信息。结果还可以用于增强骑车人可用的路线查找工具,以改善骑车体验。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li Siyuan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号