首页> 外文OA文献 >Bond and Flexural Behaviour of Self Consolidating Concrete Beams Reinforced and Prestressed with FRP Bars
【2h】

Bond and Flexural Behaviour of Self Consolidating Concrete Beams Reinforced and Prestressed with FRP Bars

机译:FRP筋加筋和预应力的自固结混凝土梁的粘结和挠曲性能

摘要

Self consolidating concrete (SCC) is widely used in the construction industry. SCC is a high performance concrete with high workability and consistency allowing it to flow under its own weight without vibration and making the construction of heavily congested structural elements and narrow sections easier. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement, with its excellent mechanical properties and non-corrosive characteristic, is being used as a replacement for conventional steel reinforcement. In spite of the wide spread of SCC applications, bond and flexural behaviour of SCC beams reinforced or prestressed with FRP bars has not been fully studied. Furthermore, the ACI 440.1R-06 equation for determining the development length of FRP bars is based on Glass FRP (GFRP) bars and may not be applicable for Carbon FRP (CFRP) bars. This research program included an experimental and analytical study to investigate the flexural and bond behaviour of SCC beams reinforced with FRP bars and SCC beams prestressed with CFRP bars. In the experimental phase, fifty-six beams were fabricated and tested. Sixteen of these beams were prestressed with CFRP bars and forty beams were reinforced with non-prestressed GFRP or CFRP bars. Four concrete batches were used to fabricate all the specimens. Three mixes were of self consolidating concrete (SCC) and one mix was of normal vibrated concrete (NVC). The test parameters for the non-prestressed beams were the concrete type, bar type and bar diameter, concrete cover thickness and embedment length while the test parameters for the prestressed beams were the concrete type and the prestressing level (30%, 45% and 60%). The transfer length of the prestressed CFRP bars was determined by means of longitudinal concrete strain profile and draw-in methods. All beams were tested in four-point bending to failure. Measurements of load, midspan deflection, bar slip if any at the beam ends, strain in reinforcing FRP bar at various locations, and strain in concrete at the beam midspan were collected during the flexural test. The concrete compressive strength at flexural tests of SCC mix-1, mix-2, and mix-3 were 62.1MPa, 49.6MPa and 70.9MPa, respectively and for the NVC mix was 64.5MPa. The material test results showed that SCC mixes had lower modulus of elasticity mechanical properties than the NVC mix. The modulus of elasticity of the SCC mixes ranged between 65% and 82% of the NVC mix. The modulus of rupture of the SCC mixes was 86% of the NVC mixes.The test results for beams prestressed with CFRP bars revealed that the variation of transfer length of CFRP bars in SCC versus their prestressing level was nonlinear. The average measured transfer lengths of 12.7mm diameter CFRP bars prestressed to 30%, 45% and 60% was found to be 25db, 40db, 54db, respectively. Measured transfer lengths of the 12.7mm diameter CFRP bar prestressed to 30% in SCC met the ACI440.4 prediction. However, as the prestressing level increased, the predicted transfer length became unconservative. At a 60% prestress level, the measured/prediction ratio was 1.25. Beams prestressed with CFRP bars and subjected to flexural testing with shear spans less than the minimum development length had local bar slippage within the transmission zone. Beams that experienced local bond slip, their stiffness was significantly decreased. A modification to the existing model used to calculate the transfer and development lengths of CFRP bars in NVC beams was proposed to account for the SCC.The test results for beams reinforced with FRP bars indicated that the average bond strength of CFRP bars in NVC concrete is about 15% higher than that of GFRP bars in NVC. The ACI 440.1R-06 equation overestimated the development length of the CFRP bars by about 40%, while CAN/CSA-S6-06 equation was unconservative by about 50%. A new factor of (1/1.35) was proposed to estimate the development length of the CFRP bars in NVC when the ACI440.1R-06 equation is used.Beams made from SCC showed closer flexural crack spacing than similar beams made from NVC at a similar loading. The deflection of beams made from SCC and reinforced with CFRP bars was found to be slightly larger than those made from NVC. The average bond stresses of GFRP and CFRP bars in SCC were comparable to those in NVC. However, FRP bars embedded in SCC beams had higher bond stresses within the uncracked region of the beams than those embedded in NVC beams. In contrast, FRP bars in SCC had lower bond stresses than FRP bars in NVC within the cracked region. The average bond strength of GFRP in SCC was increased by 15% when the concrete cover thickness increased from 1.0db to 3.0db. Cover thicknesses of 2db and 3db were found to be sufficient to prevent bond splitting failure of GFRP and CFRP bars in SCC, respectively. Bond splitting failure was recorded when the cover thickness dropped to 1.5db for the GRP bars and to 2.0db for the CFRP bars. An insignificant increase in average bond stress was found when the bar diameter decreased from 12.7mm to 6.3mm for the CFRP bars, and a similar increase occurred in GFRP bars when the bar diameter decreased from 15.9mm to 9.5mm.New models to calculate the development length of GFRP and CFRP bars embedded in SCC were proposed based on the experimental results. These models capture the average bond stress profile along the embedment length. A good agreement was found between the proposed model and the experimental results.Analytical modeling of the load-deflection response based on the effective moment of inertia (ISIS Canada M5) was unconservative for SCC beams reinforced with CFRP bars by 25% at ultimate loading. A new model for bond stress versus Ma/Mcr (applied moment to cracking moment) ratio was developed for GFRP and CFRP bars in SCC and for CFRP bars in NVC. These bond stress models were incorporated in a new rigorous model to predict the load-deflection response based on the curvature approach. The FRP bar extension and bond stress models were used to calculate the load-deflection response. With these models 90% of the calculated deflections were found to be within ± 15% of the experimental measured results for SCC beams reinforced with FRP bars.Analytical modeling of the load-deflection for NVC and SCC beams prestressed with CFRP bars are proposed done. The moment resistance was calculated using Sectional Analysis approach. The deflection was calculated using simplified and detailed methods. The simplified method was based on the effective moment of inertia while the detailed method was based on effective moment of inertia and effective centroid. The experimental results correlated well with the detailed method at higher loads range.This study provided an understanding of the mechanism of bond and flexural behaviour of FRP reinforced and prestressed SCC beams. The information presented in this thesis is valuable for designers using FRP bars as flexural reinforcement and also for the development of design guidelines for SCC structures.
机译:自固结混凝土(SCC)在建筑行业中广泛使用。 SCC是一种高性能混凝土,具有较高的可加工性和一致性,可使其在自重下流动而不会产生振动,并且使严重拥挤的结构元件和狭窄截面的施工变得容易。纤维增强聚合物(FRP)增强材料具有出色的机械性能和非腐蚀特性,可替代常规的钢增强材料。尽管SCC应用广泛,但尚未充分研究用FRP筋加固或预应力的SCC梁的粘结和挠曲性能。此外,用于确定FRP条发展长度的ACI 440.1R-06公式基于玻璃FRP(GFRP)条,可能不适用于碳FRP(CFRP)条。该研究计划包括一项实验和分析研究,以研究FRP筋加固的SCC梁和CFRP筋预应力的SCC梁的挠曲和粘结性能。在实验阶段,制造并测试了56束。其中的16根梁用CFRP筋预应力,而40根梁用非预应力GFRP或CFRP筋加固。使用四批混凝土来制作所有样本。三种混合物是自凝结混凝土(SCC),一种混合​​物是普通振动混凝土(NVC)。非预应力梁的试验参数为混凝土类型,钢筋类型和钢筋直径,混凝土覆盖层厚度和包埋长度,而预应力梁的试验参数为混凝土类型和预应力水平(30%,45%和60) %)。预应力CFRP筋的传递长度是通过纵向混凝土应变曲线和引入方法确定的。所有梁均经过四点弯曲测试,直至断裂。在弯曲试验期间,收集了载荷,中跨挠度,梁端部的滑移(如果有),在各个位置的FRP筋的应变以及梁中跨混凝土的应变。 SCC mix-1,mix-2和mix-3弯曲试验时的混凝土抗压强度分别为62.1MPa,49.6MPa和70.9MPa,NVC混合物为64.5MPa。材料测试结果表明,SCC混合物比NVC混合物具有更低的弹性模量机械性能。 SCC混合物的弹性模量为NVC混合物的65%至82%。 SCC混合料的断裂模量为NVC混合料的86%。CFRP筋预应力梁的测试结果表明,CFRP筋在混凝土中的传递长度随其预应力水平的变化是非线性的。发现预应力为30%,45%和60%的直径为12.7mm的CFRP钢筋的平均测量传输长度分别为25db,40db,54db。在SCC中预应力为30%的直径为12.7mm的CFRP钢筋的测量传输长度符合ACI440.4的预测。但是,随着预应力水平的提高,预计的传递长度变得不保守。在60%的预应力水平下,测量/预测比率为1.25。用CFRP筋预应力并经过剪切跨度小于最小展开长度的弯曲试验的梁在传输区内出现局部筋滑移。经历局部粘结滑移的梁,其刚度明显降低。提出了对计算NVC梁中CFRP筋传递和发展长度的现有模型的修正,以解决SCC问题。FRP筋加固梁的试验结果表明,CFRP筋在NVC混凝土中的平均粘结强度为。比NVC中的GFRP钢筋高约15%。 ACI 440.1R-06公式高估了CFRP条的展开长度约40%,而CAN / CSA-S6-06公式不保守约50%。当使用ACI440.1R-06方程时,提出了一个新的因子(1 / 1.35)来估算NVC中CFRP钢筋的发展长度。类似的负载。发现由SCC制成并用CFRP筋加固的梁的挠度比由NVC制成的梁稍大。 SCC中GFRP和CFRP筋的平均粘结应力与NVC中的相当。但是,嵌入在SCC梁中的FRP筋比嵌入在NVC梁中的FRP筋具有更高的粘结应力。相反,在裂纹区域内,SCC中的FRP筋的粘结应力低于NVC中的FRP筋。当混凝土覆盖层厚度从1.0db增加到3.0db时,SCC中GFRP的平均粘结强度增加了15%。发现2db和3db的覆盖层厚度足以防止SCC中GFRP和CFRP条的粘结分裂失败, 分别。当GRP试条的覆盖层厚度降至1.5db,CFRP试条的覆盖层厚度降至2.0db时,记录了键断裂失败的情况。当CFRP钢筋的钢筋直径从12.7mm减小到6.3mm时,平均粘结应力没有显着增加,而当GFRP钢筋的直径从15.9mm减小到9.5mm时,GFRP钢筋也出现了类似的增加。根据实验结果提出了埋藏在SCC中的GFRP和CFRP钢筋的发展长度。这些模型捕获了沿嵌入长度的平均粘结应力分布。所提出的模型与实验结果之间找到了很好的一致性。基于有效惯性矩的荷载-挠度响应的分析模型(ISIS Canada M5)对于采用CFRP筋加固的SCC梁,在极限荷载下25%是不保守的。针对SCC中的GFRP和CFRP钢筋以及NVC中的CFRP钢筋,开发了一种新的粘结应力与Ma / Mcr(施加力矩与开裂力矩)之比的模型。这些粘结应力模型被合并到一个新的严格模型中,以基于曲率方法预测载荷-挠度响应。 FRP钢筋延伸和粘结应力模型用于计算载荷-挠度响应。利用这些模型,发现FRP筋加固的SCC梁的计算挠度的90%在实验测量结果的±15%范围内。建议对CFRP筋预应力的NVC和SCC梁的荷载挠度进行分析建模。使用截面分析方法计算抗弯矩。使用简化和详细的方法计算挠度。简化方法基于有效惯性矩,而详细方法基于有效惯性矩和有效质心。在较高的载荷范围内,试验结果与详细方法有很好的相关性。本研究为FRP加固和预应力SCC梁的粘结机理和抗弯性能提供了一种理解。本文所提供的信息对于使用FRP筋作为抗弯钢筋的设计者以及对于SCC结构设计指南的开发都是有价值的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Krem Slamah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号