首页> 外文OA文献 >Response of Peatland Microbial Community Function to Contamination by Naphthenic Acids and Sodium in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada
【2h】

Response of Peatland Microbial Community Function to Contamination by Naphthenic Acids and Sodium in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada

机译:加拿大艾伯塔省阿萨巴斯卡油砂地区泥炭地微生物群落功能对环烷酸和钠污染的响应

摘要

Reclamation of closed oil sands mining operations in former pristine boreal ecosystems of the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Alberta, Canada (AOSR) requires construction of new fen land uses such as peatlands in order to meet the environmental regulatory requirements for restoration of ‘equivalent landscape capacity’ and because ‘wetlands are required as an integral part of the reclaimed landscape’ (Alberta Government 2000). Reconstruction rather than restoration is required due to the extensive disruption to the vegetation and hydrology of these sites inherent to the mining process. Such sites will be constructed with tailings sands forming part of the aquifer; consequently, they may be exposed through leaching to a variety of chemical contaminant species either not present (e.g. naphthenic acids) or present at significantly higher-than-baseline concentrations (Na+) than in the pre-disturbance sites. The presence of these contaminants is likely to affect both the plant and microbial communities, which are the two major players in the carbon cycling function of peatland landscapes, and the effects of these contaminants on the microbial community is unknown in such landscapes. Oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) contains high concentrations of the contaminants to which these sites might be exposed. This study therefore tested the effects of OSPW on the aerobic and anaerobic carbon-cycling potential activity of the microbial communities of a variety of reference peatlands from the AOSR to determine the possible effects these contaminants might have on the communities of these constructed sites, through measurement of substrate-induced respiration (SIR) and methanogenic potential respectively. This study also measured the baseline aerobic and anaerobic carbon-cycling potential of these sites, to provide a reference baseline against which site managers might measure the development of such sites.Aerobic carbon-cycling potential at the start of the growing season was not significantly different (p=0.799) between the hypersaline rich fen and the Sphagnum-dominated poor fen, which both had significantly greater aerobic carbon-cycling potential than the treed rich fen at the start of the growing season. The sites’ aerobic carbon-cycling potential did not significantly differ between any pair of sites at midseason. The low potential of the treed rich fen was attributed to phosphorus limitation indicated by a substrate preference for low molecular-weight organic acids in that site. None of the sites displayed any significant change in overall SIR on exposure to OSPW, though the hypersaline site showed an SIR preference for saccharide compounds only under contamination, attributed to salt stress response from the high levels of Na+ present in OSPW. The overall lack of effect of OSPW contamination was likely either due to short incubation times (6h) or the immobilization of OSPW contaminants through physical and chemical interactions with the peat substrate.Control methanogenic potential was highest at the treed rich fen, significantly lower at the poor Sphagnum-dominated fen, and significantly lower than either of the other two sites at the hypersaline rich fen. The extremely low control methane of the hypersaline rich fen site was likely due to the presence of sulfate in the pore water of that site and inhibition of methanogenesis via the presence of a more thermodynamically favourable terminal electron acceptor. Exposure to OSPW significantly decreased methanogenic potential in both the treed rich fen and the hypersaline rich fen, but had no significant impact on methanogenic potential in the Sphagnum-dominated poor fen. As amendment with OSPW containing twice its usual concentration of Na+ did not significantly further decrease methanogenic potential, it appears unlikely that high sodium concentrations are responsible for the inhibitory effect. The mechanism of resistance to OSPW inhibition in the Sphagnum-dominated poor fen is also unclear, but may be the consequence of a more-resilient microbial community or the rapid consumption by the microbial community of any alternative electron acceptors that might be suppressing methanogenesis. These results have implications for the construction of site-reclamation peatlands. Identifying the mechanism of resistance to OSPW contamination of methanogenesis in Sphagnum peat will inform choices about its use in the construction of such sites.
机译:在加拿大艾伯塔省阿萨巴斯卡油砂地区的原始原始北方生态系统中进行的封闭油砂开采作业的复垦(AOSR)要求建设新的芬土地用途(例如泥炭地),以满足恢复“等效景观容量”的环境法规要求”,因为“湿地是填海造林必不可少的一部分”(艾伯塔省政府,2000年)。由于采矿过程固有的这些地点的植被和水文受到广泛破坏,因此需要重建而不是恢复。此类场地将用构成含水层一部分的尾矿砂建造;因此,它们可能会因浸出而暴露于多种化学污染物,这些化学污染物要么不存在(例如环烷酸),要么以明显高于干扰前位点的基线浓度(Na +)存在。这些污染物的存在可能会影响植物和微生物群落,这是泥炭地景观碳循环功能的两个主要参与者,在这些景观中未知这些污染物对微生物群落的影响。受油砂过程影响的水(OSPW)包含高浓度的污染物,这些部位可能会暴露在其中。因此,这项研究测试了OSPW对来自AOSR的各种参考泥炭地微生物群落的好氧和厌氧碳循环潜在活性的影响,从而通过测量来确定这些污染物可能对这些建筑场地的群落产生的影响。底物诱导的呼吸(SIR)和产甲烷的潜力。这项研究还测量了这些场所的基线有氧和厌氧碳循环潜力,以提供参考基准,场所管理者可以以此为基准来评估这些场所的生长。生长季节开始时的有氧碳循环潜力没有显着差异(p = 0.799)高盐富芬和以泥炭藓为主的贫芬之间,在生长季节开始时,它们都比树木丰富的芬具有明显更大的需氧碳循环潜力。在赛季中期,任何一对站点之间的有氧碳循环潜力均无显着差异。富树的芬芳的低潜力归因于磷限制,这是由该位置对低分子量有机酸的底物偏爱指示的。尽管高盐碱站点仅在污染下表现出对糖类化合物的SIR偏爱,但这两个站点都没有显示出在OSPW中总体SIR有任何显着变化,这归因于OSPW中存在的高水平Na +引起的盐胁迫响应。 OSPW污染的总体缺乏影响可能是由于孵育时间短(6h)或由于OSPW污染物通过与泥炭基质的物理和化学相互作用而固定的。贫水草为主的,且明显低于高盐富sa的其他两个站点。富含高盐分的芬位点的控制甲烷极低,可能是由于该位点的孔隙水中存在硫酸盐,并且由于存在热力学上更有利的末端电子受体而抑制了甲烷生成。暴露于OSPW会显着降低树木丰富的芬和高盐丰富的芬的产甲烷潜力,但对以泥炭藓为主的劣芬的产甲烷潜力没有显着影响。由于用OSPW所含的Na +浓度是其通常浓度的两倍,其修正剂并未显着进一步降低产甲烷的潜力,因此高钠浓度似乎不太可能引起抑制作用。在泥炭藓为主的弱芬中对OSPW抑制的抗性机制也不清楚,但这可能是由于微生物群落更具弹性或微生物群落迅速消耗了可能抑制产甲烷作用的任何其他电子受体所致。这些结果对现场垦殖泥炭地的建设具有影响。鉴定泥炭藓泥炭对甲烷化甲烷化对OSPW污染的抗性机理将为选择在此类位点中使用提供依据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Date Vinay;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:13:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号