首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Law at the Service of Democracy: A Reading of Arosemenau27s Constitutional Studies of the Latin American Governments
【2h】

Comparative Law at the Service of Democracy: A Reading of Arosemenau27s Constitutional Studies of the Latin American Governments

机译:民主服务比较法 - 对拉美政府宪法学研究的一种解读

摘要

In 1870, Justo Arosemena published Constitutional Studies of the Governments of Latin America in France. Arosemena wanted to promote a constitutional harmonization of the Latin American legal orders. He thought a harmonization would make it easier for a citizen of a Latin American country to enjoy similar rights in any Latin American country. Once the Latin American harmonization was completed, Arosemena hoped that an integration of the American continent would be possible. A utopian ideal of a universal society nourished Arosemena’s work. He believed that in the future, humanity would be organized in small cities linked through morality, economy, culture, and science. No more a source of national identity, the state would guarantee fundamental rights to every person, irrespective of nationality. Yet, the realities of the 19th and 20th centuries challenged Arosemena’s vision. Readily dismissible as utopian, Constitutional Studies was forgotten. Still, there is a good reason for reexamining Constitutional Studies anew. Globalization, a third wave of increasing world integration, is bringing comparative constitutional law to the foreground. A reading of Constitutional Studies may contribute to thinking about the limits and possibilities of comparative constitutional law now. Indeed, Constitutional Studies is both an attempt to coordinate constitutional law to promote integration and an attempt to develop a transnational constitutional discourse. This study will show Arosemena’s main contribution to comparative constitutional law.
机译:1870年,贾斯托·阿罗斯梅纳(Justo Arosemena)在法国发表了《拉丁美洲政府宪政研究》。 Arosemena希望促进拉丁美洲法律秩序的宪法统一。他认为,统一将使拉丁美洲国家的公民更容易在任何拉丁美洲国家享有类似的权利。拉丁美洲的协调工作一旦完成,阿罗斯梅纳(Arosemena)希望能够实现美洲大陆的一体化。普世社会的乌托邦理想滋养了Arosemena的作品。他相信,将来,人类将在通过道德,经济,文化和科学联系起来的小城市中组织起来。国家不再是国家认同的来源,国家将保证每个人的基本权利,无论其国籍如何。然而,19世纪和20世纪的现实挑战了Arosemena的愿景。宪政研究一度被视为乌托邦式,但现在却被人们忽略了。尽管如此,仍然有充分的理由重新审查宪法研究。全球化是世界一体化进程不断发展的第三次浪潮,它正将比较宪法法置于前台。阅读宪法研究可能有助于思考现在比较宪法的局限性和可能性。的确,宪政研究既是试图协调宪法以促进一体化的尝试,也是发展跨国宪法话语的尝试。这项研究将显示Arosemena对比较宪法的主要贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gonzalez Marcos Miguel;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号