首页> 外文OA文献 >Design science in health care: Co-designing an optimized patient pathway at a gynecological clinic of a large hospital in Switzerland.
【2h】

Design science in health care: Co-designing an optimized patient pathway at a gynecological clinic of a large hospital in Switzerland.

机译:医疗保健设计科学:在瑞士一家大型医院的妇科诊所共同设计优化的患者通路。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Jones mentions that “Healthcare is a complex system that deals with at least two irreducible sources of complexity: The institutional (distributed provider systems and hospitals) and the personal (the biological and social setting of the human body). Furthermore these realms cannot be isolated, because the purpose of the institution is to serve individuals.” (Jones, 2013a, xviii) Hospitals operate as institutional actors under pressure to navigate changing health care contexts where patients become more knowledgeable and more demanding. The challenge for design thinking is to “transforming organizational practices by continually repositioning real human beings in the center of design and service management decisions.” (Jones, 2013a, xvii) Dubberly et. al. (2010) go even further, describing a shift where patients eventually become self-managing designers of their own well-being based on designed enabling infrastructures.udThis design research project aims at demonstrating the value of the design approach vis-à-vis a care team at a gynecological clinic with regard to improving pregnant women´s experiences along the patient pathway. The scientific goal is to demonstrate how design research can yield evidence and derived design propositions to drive improvement and innovation efforts through a co-creation approach informed by an “understanding of an understanding” (Krippendorff, 2005) of women that told their stories of giving birth, generated by means of a grounded theory approach.udThe research team facilitated a workshop with 8 clinic professionals (midwifes, nurses, breastfeeding counselor, department managers, clinic director), 3 patients and 1 external midwife. They crafted a model and issues-related design propositions – later to be tested in situ – of an optimized version of a patient process. The results are evaluated against the “design capability for health practice and care organizations” framework of Jones (2013b, 5) with a specific focus on design as caregiving and co-creating care (Rethinking Care), design for patient agency, patient-centered care service (Rethinking Patients), as well as innovating points of care and systemic design in healthcare innovation (Rethinking Care Systems). The results are triangulated with 2 Scandinavian, design-related projects that focus on patient pathways. The project contributes overall to an evidence creation capability of design research at the intersection of organizational and design science.
机译:琼斯提到:“医疗保健是一个复杂的系统,它处理至少两个不可减少的复杂性源:机构(分布式提供者系统和医院)和个人(人体的生物学和社会环境)。此外,这些领域不能孤立,因为该机构的目的是为个人服务。” (Jones,2013a,xviii)医院在压力下应对越来越多的医疗保健环境(患者变得更加了解和要求更高)的机构行为者的运作。设计思维的挑战是“通过在设计和服务管理决策的中心不断地重新定位真实的人,来改变组织实践。” (Jones,2013a,xvii)Dubberly等。等(2010)走得更远,描述了一个转变,患者最终将基于设计的支持基础设施成为自我管理自己的福祉的设计师。 ud此设计研究项目旨在证明设计方法相对于设计的价值。妇科诊所的护理团队,以改善孕妇在患者路径上的体验。科学目标是通过对女性的“了解”(Krippendorff,2005年)为基础的共创方法,展示设计研究如何能够产生证据和衍生设计命题,从而推动改进和创新努力。研究人员通过8位诊所专业人员(助产士,护士,母乳喂养顾问,部门经理,诊所主任),3位患者和1位外部助产士举办了研讨会。他们设计了一个模型和与问题相关的设计方案,然后对它们进行了优化,该方案随后将在现场进行测试。根据Jones(2013b,5)的“健康实践和护理组织的设计能力”框架对结果进行了评估,重点是护理和共同创建护理(重新思考护理)的设计,以患者为中心的代理设计,以患者为中心护理服务(重新思考患者),以及医疗创新中的护理创新点和系统设计(重新思考护理系统)。结果与2个与斯堪的纳维亚设计相关的项目(涉及患者途径)进行了三角测量。该项目总体上有助于组织和设计科学相交的设计研究的证据创建能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hugentobler Hans Kaspar;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号