首页> 外文OA文献 >Influence of instruments performance and material properties on exposure assessment of airborne engineered nanomaterials
【2h】

Influence of instruments performance and material properties on exposure assessment of airborne engineered nanomaterials

机译:仪器性能和材料特性对气载工程纳米材料暴露评估的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Over the last decades, materials engineered of nanosized structures have increased tremendously, in terms of both produced tonnage and economic market share. This, together with the fact that some of these engineered nanomaterials have shown an increased toxicological effect in humans as compared to their bulk counterpart, has expanded the scientific field of exposure measurements to airborne nanoparticles. As the greatest potential for human exposure to engineered nanomaterials resides within the production, packaging and downstream powdermaterial handling, as well as at reworking/waste treatment facilities, exposure risk for workers has received great focus.The studies described in this thesis come to four main conclusions: 1) Mass-balance modeling of airborne engineered nanomaterials using dustiness index as a primary source term can be useful for assessment of material-specific exposure scenarios and in decision-making regarding powder choices. 2) That such mass-balance modeling can, however, be highly sensitive to environmentalconditions, especially humidity, during storage and use, which may cause a severe misrepresentation of the true emission if the conditions during dustiness testing differ from the modeled scenario. 3) That particles with a geometrical mean diameter above 200 nm cannot be measured reliably with the Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS 3091, TSI Inc., MN, USA) but will instead be underestimated in terms of particle size and overestimated in terms of particle number concentration. Measured size distributions with particle modes above 150 nm should not be deemed reliable as they might arise from misclassification of larger size particles. 4) That current methods for real-time measurement of lung-deposited surface area concentration for airborne engineered nanomaterials are cannot be relied upon to represent comparable levels for use in exposure assessments and for other regulatory purposes.The work presented in this thesis provides understanding to improve assessment of airborne exposure to engineered nanomaterials in occupational settings. Based on conclusions drawn in this thesis, exposure assessment and control-banding models should review their use of dustiness index as a term of emission or ensure that the specific material of interest has been tested in relevant conditions. The work shows the limits of the capabilities of current techniques for measurement of airborne particle characteristics, and highlights necessary improvements for future adaptions of new metrics into regulatory testing and occupational exposure limits.
机译:在过去的几十年中,就生产吨位和经济市场份额而言,纳米结构工程材料已经大大增加。加上这些工程纳米材料中的一些与人体相比较,已显示出更高的对人体的毒理学作用,这一事实扩展了空气中纳米颗粒的暴露测量科学领域。由于人类接触工程纳米材料的最大潜力在于生产,包装和下游粉体材料的处理以及返工/废物处理设施中,因此工人的接触风险受到了极大的关注。本文所描述的研究主要涉及四个方面。结论:1)使用粉尘指数作为主要来源术语的机载工程纳米材料的质量平衡模型可用于评估特定材料的暴露情况以及有关粉末选择的决策。 2)然而,这种质量平衡模型可能在存储和使用过程中对环境条件(特别是湿度)高度敏感,如果在粉尘测试期间的条件与建模方案不同,则可能导致对真实排放物的严重误解。 3)几何平均直径大于200 nm的颗粒无法使用快速迁移粒度仪(FMPS 3091,TSI Inc.,MN,USA)可靠地测量,但是会被粒度低估,而被颗粒高估数字集中。大于150 nm的粒子模式的测量尺寸分布不应被认为是可靠的,因为它们可能是由于较大尺寸颗粒的错误分类而引起的。 4)不能依靠当前的实时测量机载工程化纳米材料的肺沉积表面积浓度的方法来代表可比较的水平用于暴露评估和其他监管目的。改善在职业环境中对工程纳米材料的空气传播暴露的评估。根据本文得出的结论,暴露评估和控制带模型应回顾其作为排放术语使用的粉尘指数,或确保已在相关条件下对目标材料进行了测试。这项工作表明了目前用于测量空气中颗粒特征的技术的局限性,并着重指出了必要的改进,以便将来将新指标应用于监管测试和职业接触限值。

著录项

  • 作者

    Levin Marcus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号