首页> 外文OA文献 >Transforming urban neighbourhoods: limits of developer-led partnership and benefit-sharing in residential redevelopment, with reference to Seoul and Beijing
【2h】

Transforming urban neighbourhoods: limits of developer-led partnership and benefit-sharing in residential redevelopment, with reference to Seoul and Beijing

机译:改变城市社区:参与首尔和北京的开发商主导的伙伴关系和住宅重建中的利益分享的限制

摘要

The thesis studies the dynamics of urban residential redevelopment programmes in Seoul and Beijing that have been effectively transforming dilapidated neighbourhoods in recent decades.udThe policy review shows that neighbourhood renewal programmes saw difficulties in ensuring cost-recovery and replicability in both cities, and that this has led to the formation of residential redevelopment programmes that depend heavily on the participation of real estate developers in spite of social, economic and political differences between the cities of Seoul and Beijing. Based on research data collected from a series of udarea-based field research visits in Seoul and Beijing between 2002 and 2003, the thesis examines how developer-led partnerships in urban redevelopment take place in different urban settings, what contributions are made by participating actors and how redevelopment benefits are shared among the existing and potential residents in udredevelopment neighbourhoods.udThe main arguments in this thesis are as follows. Firstly, the emergence of profit-making opportunities in dilapidated neighbourhoods forms the basis of developer-led partnership among property-related interests that include the local government, professional developers and property owners. Poor owner-occupiers and tenants in both Seoul and Beijing assume a more passive role. Secondly, local authorities intervene to ensure that the udpartnership framework works, but this is carried out largely in favour of professional developers and absentee landlords whose material contributions are significant. Thirdly, redevelopment benefits are shared among existing residents in differentiated ways. The most affected in negative ways are the marginalised population whose social and economic status is increasingly threatened by the market risks in times of globalisation, urban growth and redevelopment in the 1990s.udThis thesis concludes that partnerships in neighbourhood redevelopment do not have benign outcomes for all. Stronger government intervention is necessary in order to safe-guard the interests of existing residents in dilapidated neighbourhoods, ensure their participation, and in particular, increase the protection of those increasingly marginalised by the process of redevelopment.
机译:本文研究了近几十年来在首尔和北京有效地改造了破旧社区的城市住宅开发项目的动态。 ud政策审查表明,社区更新项目在确保两个城市的成本回收和可复制性方面遇到了困难,这尽管首尔和北京城市之间存在社会,经济和政治差异,但导致住宅重建计划的形成很大程度上取决于房地产开发商的参与。基于2002年至2003年在汉城和北京进行的一系列基于英国的实地考察访问而得出的研究数据,本文研究了开发商主导的伙伴关系在不同城市环境中如何发生,参与参与者的贡献以及如何在 udredevelop邻里中现有和潜在居民之间共享再开发收益。 ud本论文的主要论据如下。首先,在残旧的社区中出现了获利的机会,这构成了与房地产相关的利益攸关方(包括地方政府,专业开发商和业主)之间开发商主导的伙伴关系的基础。首尔和北京的贫困自住者和租户承担着更为被动的角色。其次,地方当局进行干预以确保“伙伴关系”框架有效,但这在很大程度上有利于对物质贡献巨大的专业开发商和缺席房东。第三,现有居民以不同的方式分享重建收益。受负面影响最大的是边缘化人口,其社会经济地位在1990年代全球化,城市增长和重建时期受到市场风险的日益威胁。 ud本论文的结论是,邻里重建中的伙伴关系不会为社会带来良性结果所有。为了捍卫处于困境的街区中现有居民的利益,确保他们的参与,特别是增加对在重建过程中日益边缘化的人的保护,政府必须加大干预力度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shin Hyun Bang;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号