首页> 外文OA文献 >Strategic versus communicative approaches to peacemaking: A critical assessment of the Dayton Peace Initiative.
【2h】

Strategic versus communicative approaches to peacemaking: A critical assessment of the Dayton Peace Initiative.

机译:制定和平的战略与交流方法:对代顿和平倡议的批判性评估。

摘要

While the objective of peacemaking efforts is the institution of a self-sustaining peace, the international community has not been able to accomplish this important goal in many war-torn societies around the world. Thus, the challenge to peacemakers is not necessarily the negotiation of a peace agreement, but its implementation in order to re-integrate a divided society and allow former combatants to address contentious issues non-violently. In light of this reality, this doctoral thesis argues that contemporary peace initiatives have not established conditions of self-sustaining peace because the majority of peacemakers have conceive their efforts according to the tenets of the strategic approach to peacemaking. The strategic approach strongly believes that a self-sustaining peace can be achieved through state-building practices. Hence the international community has devoted much of its time and resources to strengthen state structures, strongly arguing that a strong state can integrate society and make negotiated peace agreements self-sustaining. Influenced by Habermasian critical theory, this thesis presents the theoretical foundations of the communicative approach to peacemaking. The communicative approach argues that state-building projects will not integrate society, at least in the short term, but foster more conflicts between contending groups. It places a higher premium on reconciliation efforts, civil society movements, and deliberative forms of democracy. Using the Dayton peace initiative as a case study, the thesis shows the reasons why the Office of the High Representative and other international agencies in Bosnia have been unable to establish a self-sustaining peace. It also critically reviews different 'bottom-up', society-centred peacebuilding programmes practiced in Bosnia since the signing of the peace agreement, exposing both its limitations and potentials. As a result, this doctoral thesis concludes by showing that new peacebuilding strategies must incorporate aspects of both approaches to peacemaking to make peace in Bosnia self-sustaining.
机译:虽然建立和平努力的目标是建立自给自足的和平,但国际社会在世界上许多饱受战争war的社会中未能实现这一重要目标。因此,对维持和平者的挑战不一定是和平协议的谈判,而是和平协议的执行,以便使分裂的社会重新融合,并使前战斗人员能够非暴力地解决有争议的问题。鉴于这一现实,该博士论文认为,当代和平倡议尚未建立自我维持和平的条件,因为大多数和平缔造者已经按照建立和平战略方针的宗旨构想了自己的努力。该战略方针坚信,可以通过建立国家实践来实现自我维持的和平。因此,国际社会投入了很多时间和资源来加强国家结构,坚决主张一个强大的国家可以使社会融入社会并使谈判达成的和平协议能够自给自足。受哈贝马斯批判理论的影响,本论文为建立和平的交际方式提供了理论基础。交流方法认为,国家建设项目至少在短期内不会融入社会,但会加剧竞争群体之间的冲突。它对和解努力,民间社会运动和协商民主形式给予更高的重视。本文以代顿和平倡议为案例,说明了波斯尼亚高级代表办公室和其他国际机构未能建立自给自足的和平的原因。它还严格审查了自和平协定签署以来波斯尼亚实行的以社会为中心的各种“自下而上”的建设和平方案,揭示了其局限性和潜力。结果,该博士论文的结论是表明,新的建设和平战略必须纳入两种缔造和平方法的各个方面,以使波斯尼亚的和平自给自足。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yordan Carlos L;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号