首页> 外文OA文献 >A critical theory of peace practice: Discourse ethics and facilitated conflict resolution.
【2h】

A critical theory of peace practice: Discourse ethics and facilitated conflict resolution.

机译:和平实践的批判理论:话语伦理和促进冲突解决。

摘要

This thesis argues for the need to answer the question how can we use critical theory to rethink the meta-theoretical foundations of facilitated conflict resolution. It draws on Jurgen Habermas' discourse ethics-based framework and a methodology of communicative rationality to articulate the foundations of a Critical Theory of Peace Practice. An illustrative example of the Oslo Channel, which led to the Declaration of Principles and Letters of Mutual Recognition between Israel and the PLO with the third- party facilitative assistance of Norwegians in 1993, sets the stage for exploring the extent to which facilitated conflict resolution approaches can contribute to peace practices. John Burton's ideas are critically and carefully examined as he has most extensively articulated the philosophical and theoretical underpinnings of such an approach. It is contended that although he identifies practices that differ from traditional mediation approaches, theoretically he remains committed to a behavioural-oriented human needs theory and is reliant on instrumental rationality in which success in the problem-solving setting is prioritised. Other scholars and practitioners who have attempted to expand and refine the Burtonian perspective are studied. It is argued that although each offers modifications to either the theory or the practice, all fail to fundamentally move beyond instrumental rationality and human needs theory. A communicative rationality methodology and a meta-theoretical foundation of Habermas' discourse ethics is proposed for grounding a theory of peace practice. By shifting the emphasis from needs to communication, this suggested framework is intended not only to impact the facilitation process, but the broader public sphere in which the legitimacy of any reached agreements must be accepted for establishing and sustaining peace. The most promising intimations of the praxeological dimensions of such an approach can be found in the realm of conflict transformation and peace-building with their associated desire to effect changes in socio-political arrangements.
机译:本文认为有必要回答以下问题:我们如何才能使用批判理论来重新思考便利冲突解决的元理论基础。它借鉴了于尔根·哈贝马斯(Jurgen Habermas)基于话语伦理学的框架和交际理性方法,以阐明和平实践批判理论的基础。奥斯陆海峡的一个示例性例子,导致了1993年在挪威人的第三方协助下,以色列与巴解组织之间达成了《原则宣言和相互承认书》,为探索在何种程度上促进了解决冲突的方法奠定了基础可以促进和平实践。由于约翰·伯顿(John Burton)最广泛地阐明了这种方法的哲学和理论基础,因此对其进行了严格而仔细的审查。有人认为,尽管他确定的做法与传统的调解方法不同,但从理论上讲,他仍然致力于以行为为导向的人的需求理论,并且依赖工具理性,在解决问题的环境中,成功是优先考虑的。研究了其他试图扩大和完善伯顿主义视角的学者和实践者。有人认为,尽管每个人都对理论或实践进行了修改,但都不能从根本上超越工具理性和人类需求理论。哈贝马斯话语伦理学的交流理性方法论和元理论基础被提出来奠定和平实践理论的基础。通过将重点从需要转移到沟通,该拟议框架不仅旨在影响促进进程,而且还应在更广泛的公共领域内接受,必须在其中建立和维持和平的任何已达成协议的合法性。这种方法在人类学方面最有前途的暗示可以在冲突转变和和平建设领域中找到,它们伴随着改变社会政治安排的愿望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Snyder J. Lauren;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号