首页> 外文OA文献 >Governance and management of urban trees and green spaces in South Africa : ensuring benefits to local people and the environment
【2h】

Governance and management of urban trees and green spaces in South Africa : ensuring benefits to local people and the environment

机译:南非城市树木和绿地的治理和管理:确保当地人民和环境的利益

摘要

In the face of rapid urbanization and global climate change, urban trees and green spaces (UTGS) can contribute to the welfare of people and the urban environment. Urban trees and green spaces can assist to address urbanization challenges related to environmental degradation. While functions of UTGS have been well documented in the developed world, they have not yet received full attention in much of sub-Saharan Africa. Consequently, UTGS are under threat from urban development and fragmentation. Notably, the problems associated with UTGS also fall into the governance realm and indications are that poor governance and management of UTGS can negatively influence the potential benefits of UTGS to local people and the environment. This formed a basis for this research. The main objective of the study was to determine the current governance and management approaches to UTGS in South Africa. Through document search and review, the study determined the governance institutions influencing UTGS at national level and at provincial level (in the Limpopo and Eastern Cape Provinces). Face-to-face and online survey methods were used to determine the extent to which 28 local municipalities had adopted planned, systematic and integrated management of UTGS. The snowball approach was used to determine the key actors involved in UTGS activities and interviews were conducted to establish the roles and capabilities of these actors. A total of 540 household interviews were conducted to determine the institutional factors influencing local peoples’ ability to access, plant and use UTGS. The findings of the study showed that UTGS have not been adequately covered in existing governance institutions and practice at national and provincial levels. Local government municipalities were not managing their UTGS in a planned or systematic manner due to constraining factors such as insufficient funds, insufficient personnel, lack of equipment and lack of political support. Only 7.1 % of the surveyed municipalities had an urban tree management plan and an estimate of the urban tree stock; 32.1 % had tree policies; 28.6 % had tree bylaws; 21.4 % had tree planting schedules; 10.7 % had tree maintenance schedules and only 3.6 % had tree inspection schedules. Key actors involved in UTGS activities differed among levels of government. The actors included national and provincial government departments, local government municipalities, Non-Governmental Organizations, private sector companies and local volunteers. Most of the actors, however, either planted trees or provided tree seedlings to municipalities and the local people. Tenure security was a key institutional factor affecting peoples’ ability to plant, use or even remove trees from their residential plots. The same applied to trees in the streets and public parks. Whereas most respondents did not require permission to plant (79.8 %) or remove (75 %) trees on their residential plots, a majority of them required permission to plant and remove trees from streets (over 70 %) and public parks (over 80 %). However, with regard to planting and removing urban trees in public open spaces, 54% of the respondents indicated that permission was not required suggesting a lack of clarity among local residents on the issue. Overall, the findings of this study indicate that there is no political recognition and support for UTGS at almost all levels of government. This has resulted in the lack of incorporation of UTGS in urban planning and development and has caused UTGS to receive limited funding to permit planned and systematic management. Given the current rates of urbanization and urban development, the lowly prioritised UTGS are vulnerable to exploitation. To conserve UTGS and promote their potential contribution to local people and the environment, UTGS must be recognized and placed on political and development agendas. There is a need to develop national guidelines for UTGS management, assess the extent of the urban forest resource in local municipalities, clearly define the roles and capabilities of different actors, integrate UTGS in the urban planning and development system, and most of all seek to involve the local people in overall management and governance of UTGS.
机译:面对快速的城市化和全球气候变化,城市树木和绿地(UTGS)可以为人们的福利和城市环境做出贡献。城市树木和绿地可以帮助应对与环境退化有关的城市化挑战。尽管UTGS的功能在发达国家已得到充分证明,但在撒哈拉以南非洲的许多地区,UTGS尚未得到足够的重视。因此,UTGS受到城市发展和碎片化的威胁。值得注意的是,与UTGS相关的问题也属于治理领域,并且表明UTGS的不良治理和管理可能会对UTGS对当地人民和环境的潜在利益产生负面影响。这为这项研究奠定了基础。该研究的主要目的是确定南非UTGS的当前治理和管理方法。通过文件搜索和审查,研究确定了在国家和省(林波波省和东开普省)影响UTGS的治理机构。使用面对面和在线调查方法来确定28个地方城市采用UTGS的计划,系统和综合管理的程度。使用滚雪球的方法确定参与UTGS活动的关键参与者,并进行访谈以确定这些参与者的角色和能力。总共进行了540次家庭访谈,以确定影响当地人民获取,种植和使用UTGS能力的制度因素。研究结果表明,在国家和省级的现有治理机构和实践中并未充分涵盖UTGS。由于资金不足,人员不足,设备不足和缺乏政治支持等制约因素,地方政府市政当局无法以计划或系统的方式管理其UTGS。只有7.1%的被调查城市有城市树木管理计划和城市树木存量的估计。 32.1%的人有树政策; 28.6%的人拥有树木条例; 21.4%的人有植树计划;有10.7%的树木具有维护计划,只有3.6%的树木具有维护计划。参与UTGS活动的关键参与者在政府级别之间有所不同。参与者包括国家和省政府部门,地方政府,非政府组织,私营公司和当地志愿者。但是,大多数演员要么种树,要么向市政当局和当地居民提供树苗。权属安全是影响人们种植,使用甚至从居住地砍伐树木的能力的关键制度因素。街道和公园的树木也是如此。大多数受访者不需要在居住地上种树(79.8%)或砍伐树木(75%),而大多数受访者则需要在街道上(70%以上)和公园(80%以上)种植和砍伐树木。 )。然而,关于在公共开放空间种植和清除城市树木的问题,有54%的受访者表示不需要许可,这表明当地居民对此问题缺乏明确性。总体而言,这项研究的结果表明,几乎所有各级政府都没有对UTGS的政治认可和支持。这导致将UTGS缺乏纳入城市规划和发展中,并导致UTGS获得有限的资金以进行计划的和系统的管理。考虑到当前的城市化和城市发展速度,低优先级的UTGS容易受到剥削。为了保护UTGS并促进其对当地人民和环境的潜在贡献,必须承认UTGS并将其置于政治和发展议程中。有必要制定有关UTGS管理的国家指南,评估当地城市中城市森林资源的范围,明确定义不同参与者的作用和能力,将UTGS纳入城市规划和发展系统,并且所有这些都力求让当地人参与UTGS的整体管理和治理。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chishaleshale Mwale;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号