首页> 外文OA文献 >Fight for Frontage: A Shopping Mall On a High Street
【2h】

Fight for Frontage: A Shopping Mall On a High Street

机译:为正面而战:大街上的一家购物中心

摘要

Natural movement is defined as the pedestrian movement potentially generated by the configuration of the street network irrespective of any other factors (Hillier et al 1993). The structure of the urban fabric is considered to be the primary generator of movement, although attractors such as specific ‘land uses’ for example, might also act as factors in generating additional movement. Traditional shops along a high street build upon the potential provided by natural movement. Conversely, the concept of shopping malls is to create attraction through concentrated land-uses (retail density) allied to car accessibility (regardless of pedestrian accessibility). The spatial juxtaposition of these two retail models therefore challenges the way the syntactic structure of the street operates, resulting in multiple frontages and points of access that may pose conflicting demands and a sense of disorientation. udThe case study is a shopping mall located in the Newcastle City Centre, bordered on one side by the high street and on another by one of the main city squares. This ‘hybrid’ building has developed its own circulation system: it is publicly accessible but privately owned, which implies restricted accessibility over the course of the day and week. As such, accessibility is re-evaluated depending upon the nature of the internal open space (privately owned but, at times, publically accessible). Accessibility is measured at the city scale, and the neighbourhood scale inclusive and exclusive of the internal open space. It is also assessed by the volume of shoppers entering the shopping mall’s 20 separate entrances and is linked back to the syntactic structure of the streets. Finally, the impact of movement generated by street structure on retail located in the shopping mall is analysed through the layout of a department store that fronts both the shopping mall (internal frontage) while having also maintained its traditional frontage onto the high street (external frontage).
机译:自然运动被定义为不管其他因素如何,由街道网络的配置潜在地产生的行人运动(Hillier等,1993)。尽管吸引者(例如特定的“土地用途”)也可能是产生更多运动的因素,但城市结构仍被认为是运动的主要产生者。高街上的传统商店建立在自然运动所提供的潜力之上。相反,购物中心的概念是通过集中土地使用(零售密度)与汽车的可及性(不论行人可及性)相关联来创造吸引力。因此,这两种零售模式在空间上的并置挑战了街道句法结构的运作方式,从而导致了多个正面和接触点,这可能构成相互矛盾的需求和迷失方向。 ud案例研究是位于纽卡斯尔市中心的一家购物中心,一侧与高街接壤,另一侧与主要城市广场之一接壤。这座“混合式”建筑已经建立了自己的流通系统:可公开访问但由私人拥有,这意味着在白天和一周的整个过程中,可访问性受到限制。因此,可访问性将根据内部开放空间的性质(私有所有,但有时可公开访问)进行重新评估。可达性是在城市范围内衡量的,而在邻里范围内则包括和不包括内部开放空间。还可以通过进入购物中心20个独立入口的购物者数量进行评估,并将其链接到街道的句法结构。最后,通过百货商店的布局分析了街道结构所产生的运动对购物中心内零售的影响,该百货商店既面向购物中心(内部临街),又保持了其传统的临街至高街(外部临街)。 )。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号