首页> 外文OA文献 >Reducing nitrous oxide emissions by changing N fertiliser use from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea based formulations
【2h】

Reducing nitrous oxide emissions by changing N fertiliser use from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea based formulations

机译:通过将硝酸铵钙(CaN)的氮肥用量改为尿素基配方来减少一氧化二氮的排放

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The accelerating use of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilisers, to meet the world's growing food demand, is the primary driver for increased atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O). The IPCC default emission factor (EF) for N2O from soils is 1% of the N applied, irrespective of its form. However, N2O emissions tend to be higher from nitrate-containing fertilisers e.g. calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) compared to urea, particularly in regions, which have mild, wet climates and high organic matter soils. Urea can be an inefficient N source due to NH3 volatilisation, but nitrogen stabilisers (urease and nitrification inhibitors) can improve its efficacy. This study evaluated the impact of switching fertiliser formulation from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea-based products, as a potential mitigation strategy to reduce N2O emissions at six temperate grassland sites on the island of Ireland. The surface applied formulations included CAN, urea and urea with the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and/or the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD). Results showed that N2O emissions were significantly affected by fertiliser formulation, soil type and climatic conditions. The direct N2O emission factor (EF) from CAN averaged 1.49% overall sites, but was highly variable, ranging from 0.58% to 3.81. Amending urea with NBPT, to reduce ammonia volatilisation, resulted in an average EF of 0.40% (ranging from 0.21 to 0.69%)-compared to an average EF of 0.25% for urea (ranging from 0.1 to 0.49%), with both fertilisers significantly lower and less variable than CAN. Cumulative N2O emissions from urea amended with both NBPT and DCD were not significantly different from background levels. Switching from CAN to stabilised urea formulations was found to be an effective strategy to reduce N2O emissions, particularly in wet, temperate grassland.
机译:满足世界不断增长的粮食需求,加快使用合成氮(N)肥料是大气中一氧化二氮(N2O)浓度增加的主要驱动力。来自土壤的N2O的IPCC默认排放因子(EF)是施用的N的1%,无论其形式如何。但是,含硝酸盐的肥料(例如,硝酸盐)的N2O排放量往往更高。与尿素相比,硝酸钙铵(CAN)的含量更高,特别是在气候温和,潮湿的气候和高有机质土壤的地区。由于NH 3挥发,尿素可能是无效的氮源,但是氮稳定剂(尿素酶和硝化抑制剂)可以提高其功效。这项研究评估了将肥料配方从硝酸钙铵(CAN)改为尿素基产品的影响,以此作为减少爱尔兰岛6个温带草原站点N2O排放量的潜在缓解策略。表面施用的制剂包括CAN,尿素和具有脲酶抑制剂N-(正丁基)硫代磷酸三酰胺(NBPT)和/或硝化抑制剂双氰胺(DCD)的尿素。结果表明,N2O排放受肥料配方,土壤类型和气候条件的显着影响。 CAN的直接N2O排放因子(EF)平均占整个站点的1.49%,但变化很大,范围从0.58%到3.81。用NBPT修正尿素以减少氨气挥发,可使平均EF为0.40%(从0.21至0.69%),而尿素的平均EF为0.25%(从0.1至0.49%),两种肥料均显着比CAN的变量少且变量少。用NBPT和DCD修正的尿素累积N2O排放与背景水平没有显着差异。人们发现,从CAN转向稳定的尿素配方是减少N2O排放的有效策略,尤其是在湿温带草原。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号