首页> 外文OA文献 >A contingency framework of enterprise governance in the UK : a value-based management approach
【2h】

A contingency framework of enterprise governance in the UK : a value-based management approach

机译:英国企业治理的应急框架:基于价值的管理方法

摘要

Corporate governance (CG) has recently received much attention because of the wave of financial scandals in the early 2000s and the more recent global financial crisis. CG reforms, including laws, codes and listing rules have been established to protect shareholders’ rights and restore investors’ confidence in the capital market. These reforms have largely contributed to the evolution of internal and external governance mechanisms that are aimed at mitigating agency conflicts between managers and shareholders. However, overemphasis has been placed on the monitoring and control dimensions of governance, which may hinder entrepreneurial activities, obscure business prosperity and contribute to a narrow perspective on CG. It has been argued that there is a need to broaden CG beyond compliance (conformance) to a set of rules and laws, to include the performance aspects of governance that focus on strategy and value creation. In other words, governance should not only focus on monitoring managerial performance to ensure accountability to shareholders, but also on mechanisms that motivate management to optimise shareholders’ wealth. Enterprise governance (EG) framework has been introduced to keep the balance between the conformance and performance dimensions of governance. However, few studies address the possible tension between conformance and performance. Moreover, there is no agreement among these studies on the relationship between conformance and performance in the governance context. Arguably, Value-based Management (VBM) is an appropriate approach to address the issue of EG. VBM adopts value creation as an overall objective, develops a strategy that contributes to value creation and integrates it into decision-making. In this way, VBM can act as an effective mechanism for motivating management to maximise shareholder wealth, which works in parallel with other CG mechanisms, to mitigate agency conflicts resulting from the separation between ownership and management. This study aims to develop a contingency framework of EG through operationalising the conformance using CG and performance using corporate entrepreneurship (CE). This framework examines the inter-relationships between VBM, compliance with the Combined Code on Corporate Governance (CCCG), CE and the ultimate effect on organisational performance. More specifically, the study empirically examines the effect of compliance with the CCCG on CE, and whether VBM can achieve a balance between compliance with the CCCG and CE, should a conflict exist. The study also examines whether a fit between contingency variables (company size, agency conflicts, uncertainty, strategy and decentralisation), VBM, compliance with the CCCG codes and CE is associated with organisational performance. To achieve the aim of this study a cross-sectional survey, based on a questionnaire, is conducted to identify the level of VBM implementation, contextual and organisational factors in the large and medium quoted companies in the UK. The questionnaire targets the Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) in these companies as key informants. In addition, a content analysis of the annual reports of the sampled companies is undertaken to measure the level of compliance with the CCCG. Financial data (e.g. organisational performance) have been obtained from the DataStream, Fame and Thomson One Banker databases. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) is adopted for data analysis and hypotheses testing. The results suggest that VBM implementation is positively associated with agency conflicts, low cost strategies and decentralisation. Compliance with the CCCG is positively associated with agency conflicts and company size. CE is positively associated with company size, uncertainty and differentiation strategies. In addition, the fit between compliance with the CCCG and contingency factors significantly predicts the marketbased performance. The fit between CE and the contingency factors significantly predict the perceived performance. However, the results regarding the effect of VBM on organisational performance are mixed. While VBM has no significant direct effect on the market-based performance, VBM has indirect positive effect on the market-based performance acting through compliance with the CCCG as an intervening variable. VBM is significantly associated with compliance with the CCCG but not with CE. No evidence is found for negative association between compliance with the CCCG and CE. The results support a large number of the proposed relationships between the contingency factors, VBM, compliance with the CCCG and CE. The results also suggest that using both compliance with the CCCG and CE as intervening variables in the relationship between VBM and organisational performance contributes to explaining the mixed results in the VBM literature. In terms of the EG framework, VBM does not keep a balance between conformance and performance. VBM emphasises the compliance with the CCCG (conformance) at the expense of CE (performance). The results did not provide significant evidence of a conflict between compliance with the CCCG and CE, the area which lacks empirical evidence. This study contributes to the literature at different levels. At the theoretical level, this study develops a theoretical model that links a performance management system (PMS), i.e. VBM, to CG practices and CE. This model attempts to bridge the gap between different disciplines, including management accounting, CG and entrepreneurship. Furthermore, combining both the contingency theory and the agency theory lenses contributes to the development of a comprehensive model of EG. At the methodological level, unlike previous studies, this study measures VBM practices on a continuum, rather than categories. Multiple data collection methods are used, and a powerful statistical technique (PLS-SEM) is adopted for data analysis. At the empirical level, the study is conducted in the UK. Though it is different from the US in many aspects, very few studies have been conducted in this context in many research areas such as VBM, CG and CE.
机译:由于2000年代初的金融丑闻浪潮和最近的全球金融危机,公司治理(CG)最近受到了广泛关注。包括法律,法规和上市规则在内的企业管治改革已经建立,以保护股东的权利并恢复投资者对资本市场的信心。这些改革在很大程度上促进了内部和外部治理机制的发展,旨在缓解管理者与股东之间的代理冲突。但是,过分强调治理的监督和控制范围,这可能会阻碍创业活动,掩盖业务繁荣并导致对企业管治的狭perspective看法。有人认为,有必要将企业管治范围从合规性(合规性)扩展到一系列规则和法律,以包括专注于战略和价值创造的治理绩效方面。换句话说,治理不仅应着眼于监督管理绩效以确保对股东负责,而且应着重于激励管理层优化股东财富的机制。引入了企业治理(EG)框架,以在治理的一致性和性能维度之间保持平衡。但是,很少有研究解决一致性和性能之间可能存在的矛盾。此外,在这些研究之间,关于治理环境中的一致性与绩效之间的关系还没有达成共识。可以说,基于价值的管理(VBM)是解决EG问题的适当方法。 VBM以创造价值为总体目标,制定一项有助于创造价值的战略,并将其整合到决策中。通过这种方式,VBM可以作为激励管理层最大化股东财富的有效机制,与其他CG机制并行工作,以减轻因所有权和管理权之间的分离而引起的代理冲突。这项研究旨在通过使用CG操作一致性和使用企业企业家精神(CE)来建立EG应急框架。该框架检查了VBM,遵守《公司治理联合守则》(CCCG),CE以及对组织绩效的最终影响之间的相互关系。更具体地说,该研究从经验上检验了遵守CCCG对CE的影响,以及如果存在冲突,VBM是否可以在遵守CCCG和CE之间取得平衡。该研究还检查了应急变量(公司规模,代理冲突,不确定性,战略和权力下放),VBM,对CCCG规范和CE的遵从性是否与组织绩效相关。为了达到本研究的目的,在问卷调查的基础上进行了横断面调查,以确定英国大中型上市公司的VBM实施水平,背景和组织因素。问卷针对这些公司的首席财务官(CFO)作为关键信息提供者。此外,还对抽样企业的年度报告进行了内容分析,以衡量对CCCG的遵守程度。财务数据(例如组织绩效)已从DataStream,Fame和Thomson One Banker数据库获得。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)进行数据分析和假设检验。结果表明,实施VBM与机构冲突,低成本策略和权力下放正相关。遵守CCCG与代理机构冲突和公司规模呈正相关。 CE与公司规模,不确定性和差异化策略呈正相关。此外,对CCCG的合规性与偶然性因素之间的契合度可显着预测基于市场的绩效。 CE和意外因素之间的契合度可以显着预测感知的性能。但是,关于VBM对组织绩效的影响的结果好坏参半。尽管VBM对基于市场的绩效没有明显的直接影响,但VBM通过遵守CCCG作为中介变量,对基于市场的绩效具有间接的积极影响。 VBM与遵守CCCG的程度显着相关,但与CE无关。没有证据表明遵守CCCG和CE之间存在负关联。结果支持了意外因素,VBM,CCCG和CE遵从性之间的大量建议关系。结果还表明,将符合CCCG和CE的要求作为干预变量在VBM与组织绩效之间的关系中起了解释VBM文献中混合结果的作用。就EG框架而言,VBM无法在一致性和性能之间保持平衡。 VBM强调要遵守CCCG(一致性),而要牺牲CE(性能)。结果没有提供足够的证据证明在遵守CCCG和CE方面存在冲突,该领域缺乏经验证据。这项研究为不同层次的文献做出了贡献。在理论上,这项研究建立了一个理论模型,该模型将绩效管理系统(PMS)(即VBM)与CG实践和CE相联系。该模型试图弥合不同学科之间的差距,包括管理会计,企业管治和企业家精神。此外,将权变理论和代理理论结合起来,有助于开发综合的EG模型。在方法论层面上,与以往的研究不同,本研究以连续性而非类别来衡量VBM实践。使用了多种数据收集方法,并且采用了强大的统计技术(PLS-SEM)进行数据分析。在经验层面上,该研究在英国进行。尽管它在很多方面与美国不同,但是在这种情况下,在诸如VBM,CG和CE等许多研究领域中进行的研究很少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号