首页> 外文OA文献 >DE JURE STATELESSNESS IN SERBIA - A Critical Analysis of the Legal Framework with Regards to Combating Statelessness and the Protection of Stateless Persons
【2h】

DE JURE STATELESSNESS IN SERBIA - A Critical Analysis of the Legal Framework with Regards to Combating Statelessness and the Protection of Stateless Persons

机译:塞尔维亚的正式地位 - 对打击无国籍状态和保护无国籍人的法律框架的批判性分析

摘要

AbstractIn the age of proclamation of universalism of human rights, the interrelation between citizenship and human rights still raises concerns. Statelessness, a condition of having no nationality, affects more than 12 million people worldwide causing a legal limbo in which those who are denied a political membership are deprived of access to basic human rights. Being in the shadow of refugee and migration issues, statelessness has not only been neglected on the international arena but in academia, as well. In light of political changes in Eastern Europe during the ‘90s, statelessness came into the spotlight of the international community, as thousands of people remained stateless after the collapse of the USSR and SFRY. Lacking nationality suddenly was equated with being rightless.As international law explicitly addresses the so-called “de jure statelessness” this study examines its nature, causes and effects in a national context. Hence, the compliance of Serbian legislation with its international obligations regarding the prevention and reduction of statelessness and protection of stateless persons is the subject matter of the upcoming discussion. The research explores the extent to which the law serves as mechanism for creating and combating statelessness, as well as the level of interrelation of citizenship and human rights in the given framework. The findings show that, although generally in line with international norms, the Law on Citizenship of the Republic of Serbia still contains several gaps which may lead to statelessness. Moreover, an in-depth analysis indicates that rather than being a human, the requirement of one’s “lawful stay” is a prerequisite of access to citizenship and range of available rights. Finally, in lack of a statelessness determination procedure, rights otherwise guaranteed are at risk of remaining rights without right holders.
机译:摘要在宣扬人权普遍主义的时代,公民权与人权之间的相互关系仍然引起人们的关注。无国籍是一种无国籍的状况,影响了全世界超过1200万人,造成了法律上的困境,被剥夺了政治会员资格的人被剥夺了基本人权。在难民和移民问题的阴影下,无国籍状态不仅在国际舞台上被忽视,而且在学术界也被忽视。鉴于90年代东欧的政治变化,无国籍成为国际社会的关注焦点,因为苏联和SFRY崩溃后成千上万人无国籍。突然缺乏国籍就等于无权。由于国际法明确地解决了所谓的“法律上的无国籍状态”,这项研究在国家范围内研究了其性质,原因和影响。因此,塞尔维亚法律是否符合关于预防和减少无国籍状态和保护无国籍人的国际义务,是即将进行的讨论的主题。该研究探讨了法律在多大程度上可作为创造和打击无国籍状态的机制,以及在给定框架下公民与人权之间相互关系的水平。调查结果表明,尽管总体上符合国际准则,但《塞尔维亚共和国公民法》仍然存在一些空白,可能导致无国籍状态。此外,深入分析表明,“合法居留”不是人类,而是获得公民身份和一系列可用权利的先决条件。最后,在缺乏无国籍状态确定程序的情况下,原本可以保证的权利面临没有权利持有人的剩余权利的风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nikolic Natasa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号