首页> 外文OA文献 >PENEGAKAN HUKUM UNDANG-UNDANG No. 31 TAHUN 1999udJo. UNDANG-UNDANG No. 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANGudPEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DANudKONVENSI PBB MENGENAI KORUPSI, 2003udTERHADAP PENGEMBALIAN ASET NEGARA
【2h】

PENEGAKAN HUKUM UNDANG-UNDANG No. 31 TAHUN 1999udJo. UNDANG-UNDANG No. 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANGudPEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DANudKONVENSI PBB MENGENAI KORUPSI, 2003udTERHADAP PENGEMBALIAN ASET NEGARA

机译:法律执行法1999年第31号乔。法律编号2001年第20号关于消除腐败和刑事措施“联合国反腐败公约”,2003年追求国有资产回报

摘要

The development of crime (criminal act) which is more global and increasedudcaused the prejudice of society toward the government and legal upholders apparatusudin conducting legal supremacy in Indonesia. One of the criminal acts which is moreudglobal and complex is corruption criminal act, where currently this matter has been audcollective case for international world, by the reason of the result of corruption of audcorruption in Indonesia in generally is kept abroad in order it is difficult to beudrecognized by another person (legal upholder apparatus). This research conducted byudthe author by the hope in order could be advantageous for all level, in particularly forudthe author which would like to analyze and know on the efforts of legal enforcementudwhich is established by the Indonesia government since Indonesia ratified UNCACudand what are the factors which for so long become the barriers in the enforcement ofudUNCAC in Indonesia. This research was conducted by normative legal research, i.e.udby studying valid norms or writings (books) which have relevancies with the caseudunderstudied where the author also conducted field research in CorruptionudEradication Commission (KPK) by interviewing to one of the source persons. Afterudthe author conducted research and analysis, thus the author could conclusion that theudefforts of legal enforcement toward the restitution of state-owned assets afterudIndonesia ratified UNCAC become more actual and has big opportunities to conductudany efforts in preventing the seizure (confiscation) and management of assetsudalthough there are some matters which become the case in the implementation, bothudfrom legal point of view and the consideration of its people (legal community).
机译:犯罪(犯罪行为)的发展更加全球化,并且日益增加,这引起了社会对政府和在印度尼西亚进行法律至上的合法支持者的偏见。腐败犯罪行为是更全球性和复杂性最强的犯罪行为之一,目前该事件已成为国际世界的集体案例,由于印度尼西亚的腐败腐败行为的结果,通常将其保留在国外为了难以被另一个人(合法的持股人机器)识别。 ud作者希望以此顺序进行的研究可以对各个层面都有利,尤其是 u想要分析和了解自印度尼西亚政府批准UNCAC以来印度尼西亚政府建立的执法努力的作者。 udand长期以来成为阻碍在印度尼西亚执行 udUNCAC的障碍的因素有哪些。这项研究是通过规范性法律研究进行的,即 ud通过研究与本案有关的有效规范或著作(书籍) udststuded,其中作者还通过采访一位消息人士在腐败 ude根除委员会(KPK)进行了实地研究。人。经过 u u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u200b u003 / ///////////////////////////////经过这提供者的研究与分析后,作者可以得出结论:在印度尼西亚批准《反腐败公约》之后,执法对国有资产归还的努力变得更加现实,并且有很大的机会开展大胆的努力以防止扣押(没收)和资产管理 ud尽管在实施过程中会遇到一些问题,无论是从法律角度还是从其人员(法律团体)的角度考虑。

著录项

  • 作者

    RITONGA YOHANNA MARINI;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号