首页> 外文OA文献 >KEDUDUKAN HUKUM TERHADAP SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAMudSISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA
【2h】

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM TERHADAP SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAMudSISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA

机译:对皇冠的见证的法律地位刑事司法制度

摘要

Crown witness is often found in criminal offense cases where the cases areudinclusions and within them, splitsing or a case file division mechanism happens. Theudposition of a crown witness is not explained explicitly in the criminal code procedureud(KUHAP) and considering that it is an important instrument in criminal justice systemudenforcement, this paper will review how law position before a crown witness in criminaludjustice system.udThis final project uses normative law study and the data source was obtained fromudprimary law materials viz. related constitutions, secondary law materials namely theoriesudand literature and also tertiary law materials or Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Theudstandard used to measure the problems in this research project is whether the position ofuda crown witness is valid in criminal justice system or not. This paper was done byudsecondary data-based approach and was followed by reviewing the interview results asudsupporting data.udThe result from this paper shows that in a criminal justice system, the position of audcrown witness is legal according to the law based on certain principles viz. inclusionudcharacteristic and the lack of evidence in a case which is done by splitsing or a caseuddivision file mechanism. Based on this result, the author of this paper suggests that toudsupport the implementation of ‘fair trial’ principles, the exertion of the crown witnessudneeds to be reconsidered because it is against the essence as a suspect in regards to fulfilludthe basic rights of a suspect and the position of a crown witness should be clearly andudexplicitly defined in criminal code procedure bills.
机译:王室证人经常出现在刑事案件中,其中案件为不包括在内,并且在其中发生分裂或案件档案分割机制。刑法程序中没有明确说明王室证人的配偶 ud(KUHAP),并且考虑到这是刑事司法系统执法中的重要工具,本文将回顾刑事定居证人之前的法律地位 ud此最终项目使用规范法研究,数据来源来自初等法律资料。相关宪法,二级法材料(即理论 udand文学)以及三级法材料或Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia。在本研究项目中用来衡量问题的“不合标准”是“冠状证人”的职位在刑事司法系统中是否有效。本文通过基于辅助数据的方法来完成,然后将访谈结果作为辅助数据进行审查。 ud本文的结果表明,在刑事司法系统中,根据基于某些原则的法律,即通过拆分或案例 uddivision文件机制完成的案例中包含 udcharacteristic和缺乏证据。基于这一结果,本文的作者建议,为了支持“公平审判”原则的实施,需要重新考虑王室证人的作用,因为这与在实现 udthe刑法程序草案中应明确和明确地定义嫌疑人的基本权利和王室证人的职务。

著录项

  • 作者

    SIREGAR MICHAEL PAULUS;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号