首页> 外文OA文献 >Post-bureaucracy and reanimating public governance: A discourse and practice of continuity?
【2h】

Post-bureaucracy and reanimating public governance: A discourse and practice of continuity?

机译:后官僚制和公共治理的复兴:话语和连续性的实践?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose 'Seeks to examine changes in the environment in which public policy and public management operate and the claim that bureaucracy has been replaced by post-bureaucracy as a result of these changes.udDesign/methodology/approach – It proposes reanimated public governance as a concept that occupies the space between public administration and restructured public governance (including reinvented government and New Public Management (NPM). Rather than accepting the existence of post-bureaucracy, per se, the paper argues that there has been a process of extending bureaucracy that cuts across public and non-public boundaries rather than the development of post-bureaucracy per se. udFindings – In examining the claims for post-bureaucracy, we are witnessing a discourse and practice of continuity rather than difference. The need for economies of scale and scope, standardisation and the existence of indivisibilities in public services suggest that public sector reforms and proposals for new governance models establish extended or flexible forms of bureaucracy rather than post-bureaucratic organisational forms. Attempts to introduce ICT-based services and the need for regulatory agencies to oversee the contracts with private and non-profit service providers reinforce these findings.udResearch limitations/implications – The arguments in this paper are based on marshalling the literature and debates surrounding public sector reform to advance a central thesis. It draws on real world examples but does not advance direct empirical evidence. There is scope for internationally comparative case-studies of different public service functions and discourses and practices in different countries udPractical implications – Policy makers and managers should treat the clarion call of post-bureaucracy as a way of liberating public services from a lack of creativity, innovation and accountability with healthy scepticism. In particular, the view that public sector reforms through post-bureaucratic re-organisation will lead to efficiencies is one to be challenged. Reforms in any service driven organisations are not zero-cost and any implied operational cost saving should be considered against increased transaction costs.udOriginality/value – There have been heroic claims made for post-bureaucracy in many organisations enabled by developments associated with the concepts of information society and knowledge society. By locating public sector reforms under the rubric of 'restructured public governance' a deeper investigation of the implications for the discourses and practices associated with public sector reform is advanced.
机译:目的“寻求研究公共政策和公共管理所处环境的变化,以及由于这些变化而导致官僚主义已由后官僚主义取代的说法。 ud设计/方法论/方法–提议将复兴的公共治理作为一种该概念占据了公共行政和重组后的公共治理(包括重塑政府和新公共管理(NPM)之间的空间)的概念,而不是接受后官僚主义本身的存在,而是认为存在着一种扩大官僚主义的过程, udFindings –在考察对后官僚主义的主张时,我们正在目睹一种连续性而非差异的话语和实践。公共服务的范围,范围,标准化和存在的多样性表明,公共部门的改革和建议对于新的治理模式,ls建立的是官僚机构的扩展形式或灵活形式,而不是后官僚的组织形式。尝试引入基于ICT的服务以及监管机构监督与私人和非营利服务提供商的合同的需求,进一步强化了这些发现。 ud研究局限/含义–本文中的论点是基于整理文献和围绕公众的辩论部门改革以推进中心论题。它借鉴了现实世界中的例子,但没有提供直接的经验证据。实际意义–政策制定者和管理者应将后官僚主义的号召视为一种从缺乏创造力中解放公共服务的方式,以期对各国的不同公共服务职能,话语和实践进行国际比较的案例研究。 ,创新和问责制以及健康的怀疑态度。特别是,关于通过后官僚主义重组进行公共部门改革将提高效率的观点是一种挑战。任何服务驱动型组织的改革都不是零成本的,任何隐含的运营成本节省都应考虑到交易成本的增加。 ud原创性/价值–许多组织都对后官僚制提出了英勇的主张,这些构想与概念相关信息社会和知识社会。通过将公共部门改革置于“重组公共治理”的主题之下,可以对与公共部门改革相关的话语和实践的含义进行更深入的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Budd Leslie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号