首页> 外文OA文献 >The Economics of the Proposed European Takeover Directive. CEPS Reports in Finance and Banking No. 32, 1 April 2003
【2h】

The Economics of the Proposed European Takeover Directive. CEPS Reports in Finance and Banking No. 32, 1 April 2003

机译:拟议的欧洲收购指令的经济学。 CEps 2003年4月1日第32号金融和银行业报告

摘要

This report provides a detailed analysis of the mandatory bid rule. It examines the implications of the rule, taking into account its ex-ante and ex-post trade-offs. The report outlines clearly the valuable features of the mandatory bid rule in safeguarding against value-decreasing takeovers and assesses whether the Commission’s decision to allow member states to define the threshold for the mandatory bid is a sensible approach. The report also outlines the main elements of the break-through rule and assesses the profound changes that would take place in Europe’s takeover market should the rule be adopted. A number of recommendations are made. The report identifies a number of factors that supply good reasons for rejecting the break-through rule. These include the fact that it violates shareholder decision-making, is logically inconsistent with the mandatory bid rule and may create problems associated with two-tier takeovers. Moreover, the evidence on the efficiency implications of dual-class shares is inconclusive. The report concludes that, having highlighted the costs and benefits of the proposed break-through rule, the higher costs associated with the break-through rule outweigh the benefits.
机译:该报告提供了对强制出价规则的详细分析。它检查了规则的含义,并考虑了事前和事后的权衡取舍。该报告清楚地概述了强制竞标规则在防止增值收购中的宝贵特征,并评估了委员会允许成员国定义强制竞标阈值的决定是否明智。该报告还概述了突破规则的主要内容,并评估了如果采用该规则,欧洲收购市场将发生的深刻变化。提出了许多建议。该报告确定了许多因素,这些因素为拒绝突破规则提供了充分的理由。这些包括以下事实:它违反了股东决策,在逻辑上与强制性投标规则不一致,并可能产生与两层收购相关的问题。而且,关于双重股权的效率影响的证据尚无定论。该报告的结论是,在强调了拟议突破规则的成本和收益之后,与突破规则相关的较高成本超过了收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号