首页> 外文OA文献 >THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENT'S CRITICAL THINKING AND RESULT STUDY BETWEEN LESSONS WHICH WAS USING GUIDED AND SEMI GUIDED INQUIRY ON GEOMETRICAL OPTICS SUBJECT STUDY IN SMA N 5 YOGYAKARTA
【2h】

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENT'S CRITICAL THINKING AND RESULT STUDY BETWEEN LESSONS WHICH WAS USING GUIDED AND SEMI GUIDED INQUIRY ON GEOMETRICAL OPTICS SUBJECT STUDY IN SMA N 5 YOGYAKARTA

机译:在sma N 5 YOGYaKaRTa的几何光学研究中使用指导和半导体研究的学生的重要思想和结果研究的差异

摘要

The purposes of this research was to know: (1) the difference of student'sudcritical thinking ability (CTA), (2) the difference of student's result study whichudwas pointed from concept capability between class of guided and semi guidedudinquiry model and also, (3) which was the better of both models that coulduddeveloping CTA and improving student's result study.udThis research used Nonequivalent Control Group Design eksperimenudmethode and Cluster Random Sampling technique which resulted two classes ofud20 students in each class (XB and XC). Class XB used guided inquiry model,udmeanwhile XC used semi guided inquiry model. Data was collected from pretestudand postest instrument and also CTA observation worksheet. The CTA and resultudstudy's difference was analyzed using ANAVA by significanty 5% and theudimprovement of result study was analyzed by Standar Gain method in every class.udStatistically, there was a difference of CTA in both class but neither ofudpostest result. The average of CTA in class XB was 71,33 meanwhile XC is 77,58.udThe average of result study in XB was 65,6 meanwhile XC was 70,2. The result ofudStandar Gain analysis showing the improvement of XB's concept attainment wasudmiddle with score 0,28, meanwhile XC was low. From that, semi guided inquiryudmodel's was better to developing CTA and improving student's concept capabiity.
机译:本研究的目的是要了解:(1)学生的 U批判性思维能力(CTA)的差异,(2)从指导型和半指导型 udinquiry模型之间的概念能力所指出的学生结果学习的差异 ud (3)这两种模型都能更好地开发CTA和改善学生的学习效果。 ud这项研究使用了非等效对照组设计eksperimen udmethode和簇随机抽样技术,每组产生了两类 ud20学生类(XB和XC)。 XB类使用引导式查询模型, Xme类使用半引导式查询模型。数据从前测后测和后期测试仪器以及CTA观察工作表中收集。使用ANAVA对CTA和结果研究的差异进行了5%的显着分析,并且通过Standar Gain方法对结果研究的改进进行了分析。 ud统计上,在两个类别中CTA都有差异,但没有 stestest结果。 XB类的CTA平均值为71,33,而XC的平均值为77,58。 ud XB的结果研究平均值为65,6,而XC的平均值为70,2。 udStandar Gain分析的结果表明,XB的概念素养得到改善, udmiddle的得分为0.28,而XC较低。因此,半导式探究 udmodel更好地开发了CTA和提高了学生的概念能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wibowo Septian Johan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 16:20:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号