首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of UK academics’ conceptions of information literacy in two disciplines: English and Marketing
【2h】

A comparison of UK academics’ conceptions of information literacy in two disciplines: English and Marketing

机译:英国学者在两个学科中的信息素养概念的比较:英语和市场营销

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The authors aim to present and compare findings fromuda phenomenographic investigation into conceptions ofudinformation literacy in two populations: academics inudEnglish and Marketing disciplines teaching at Britishuduniversities. These were chosen as examples of, respectively, soft-pure and soft-applied disciplines.Weudbegin by defining information literacy and briefly settingudour research in context. We explain the nature of research using the phenomenographic approach, and describe our sample and methods. We present firstly, the four qualitatively different conceptions of information literacy held by the English academics, and then the seven conceptions held by the Marketing academics. Key differences between the conceptions held in the two disciplines are discussed, in particular relating differences to characteristics of soft-pure and soft-applied disciplines. The authors conclude thatudstudy of the differences between the conceptions held by the two disciplinary groups can illuminate and guide information literacy initiatives.
机译:作者的目的是呈现和比较来自 uda现象学调查的调查结果,以调查两个人群中 ud的信息素养素养的概念: udud的英语学者和英国 uduniversity的市场营销学科教授。这些分别被选为软性和软性学科的例子。我们通过定义信息素养和简要地设置语境来进行研究。我们使用现象学方法解释研究的本质,并描述我们的样本和方法。我们首先介绍英语学者在质量上四个不同的信息素养概念,然后是市场营销学者在七个上的概念。讨论了这两个学科中所持概念之间的主要差异,特别是将差异与软纯粹学科和软应用学科的特征相关。作者得出结论,对两个学科小组所持观念之间的差异进行研究可以阐明和指导信息素养倡议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号