首页> 外文OA文献 >Statecraft and the Assessment of National Political Leaders : The Case of New Labour and Tony Blair
【2h】

Statecraft and the Assessment of National Political Leaders : The Case of New Labour and Tony Blair

机译:治国方略与国家政治领导人的评估:新工党和托尼布莱尔案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article makes the case for employing the statecraft approach (associated with the late Jim Bulpitt) to assess political leadership in Britain. Rather than ‘importing’ methodologies from the US, as some scholars have done, statecraft is preferred in the UK context for two main reasons. First, statecraft is concerned with the motives and behaviour of leadership cliques, and as a result, it is more appropriate for the collective leadership style that is a characteristic of parliamentary systems such as that in Britain. Second, statecraft goes some way towards incorporating a sense of structural context into our evaluation of leadership performance. This need to take into account the broader institutional constraints facing chief executives is something that an increasing number of academics in this area have been calling for. The utility of the approach is illustrated through a case study of the Blair administration.
机译:本文为采用治国之道(与已故的吉姆·布皮特(Jim Bulpitt)相关)评估英国的政治领导力提供了理由。而不是像某些学者所做的那样从美国“导入”方法论,在两个方面,治国之道在英国是首选。首先,治国法与领导集团的动机和行为有关,因此,它更适合于像英国这样的议会制特征的集体领导风格。其次,治国之道在某种程度上将一种结构性背景纳入我们对领导绩效的评估中。这就需要考虑到首席执行官面临的更广泛的制度约束,这是越来越多的该领域学者呼吁的东西。通过布莱尔政府的案例研究说明了该方法的实用性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Buller Jim; James Toby;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号