首页> 外文OA文献 >Annual league tables of mortality in neonatal intensive care units: longitudinal study. International Neonatal Network and the Scottish Neonatal Consultants and Nurses Collaborative Study Group.see comment
【2h】

Annual league tables of mortality in neonatal intensive care units: longitudinal study. International Neonatal Network and the Scottish Neonatal Consultants and Nurses Collaborative Study Group.see comment

机译:新生儿重症监护病房年度死亡率表:纵向研究。国际新生儿网络和苏格兰新生儿顾问和护士合作研究小组。见评论

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether crude league tables of mortality and league tables of risk adjusted mortality accurately reflect the performance of hospitals.ududDESIGN: Longitudinal study of mortality occurring in hospital. ududSETTING: 9 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom. ududSUBJECTS: 2671 very low birth weight or preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units between 1988 and 1994. ududMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude hospital mortality and hospital mortality adjusted using the clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score. ududRESULTS: Hospitals had wide and overlapping confidence intervals when ranked by mortality in annual league tables; this made it impossible to discriminate between hospitals reliably. In most years there was no significant difference between hospitals, only random variation. The apparent performance of individual hospitals fluctuated substantially from year to year. ududCONCLUSIONS: Annual league tables are not reliable indicators of performance or best practice; they do not reflect consistent differences between hospitals. Any action prompted by the annual league tables would have been equally likely to have been beneficial, detrimental, or irrelevant. Mortality should be compared between groups of hospitals using specific criteria-such as differences in the volume of patients, staffing policy, training of staff, or aspects of clinical practice-after adjusting for risk. This will produce more reliable estimates with narrower confidence intervals, and more reliable and rapid conclusions.
机译:目的:评估死亡率的原始联盟表和风险调整后的死亡率的联盟表是否准确反映了医院的绩效。 ud ud设计:医院发生的死亡率纵向研究。 ud ud设置:英国的9个新生儿重症监护室。对象:1988年至1994年之间,有2671名极低出生体重或早产儿被新生儿重症监护病房收治。结果:按年度排行榜中的死亡率进行排序时,医院的置信区间宽且重叠;这使得无法可靠地区分医院。在大多数年份中,医院之间没有显着差异,只有随机差异。个别医院的表观表现每年都在大幅波动。结论:年度联赛表不是性能或最佳实践的可靠指标;它们不能反映出医院之间的一致差异。由年度联赛排行榜提示的任何行动都同样有可能是有益的,有害的或无关紧要的。应对风险进行调整后,应使用特定标准(例如患者数量,人员配备政策,人员培训或临床实践方面的差异)在各组医院之间比较死亡率。这将以更窄的置信区间产生更可靠的估计,并且得出更可靠和快速的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号