首页> 外文OA文献 >Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): A Tool for Critical Appraisal of Quality Improvement Intervention Publications
【2h】

Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): A Tool for Critical Appraisal of Quality Improvement Intervention Publications

机译:制定质量改进最低质量标准集(QI-mQCs):质量改进干预出版物的关键评估工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: Valid, reliable critical appraisal tools advance quality improvement (QI) intervention impacts by helping stakeholders identify higher quality studies. QI approaches are diverse and differ from clinical interventions. Widely used critical appraisal instruments do not take unique QI features into account and existing QI tools (e.g., SQUIRE) are intended for publication guidance rather than critical appraisal. This study developed and psychometrically tested a critical appraisal instrument, the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QIMQCS) for assessing QI-specific features of QI publications. Methods: Approaches to developing the tool and ensuring validity included a literature review, in-person and online survey expert panel input, and application to empirical examples. We investigated psychometric properties in a set of diverse QI publications (N=54) by analyzing reliability measures and item endorsement rates and explored sources of disagreement between reviewers. Results: The QIMQCS includes 16 content domains to evaluate QI intervention publications: Organizational Motivation, Intervention Rationale, Intervention Description, Organizational Characteristics, Implementation, Study Design, Comparator Description, Data Sources, Timing, Adherence / Fidelity, Health Outcomes, Organizational Readiness, Penetration / Reach, Sustainability, Spread, and Limitations. Median inter-rater agreement for QIMQCS items was kappa 0.57 (83% agreement). Item statistics indicated sufficient ability to differentiate between publications (median quality criteria met 67%). Internal consistency measures indicated coherence without excessive conceptual overlap (absolute mean inter-item correlation = 0.19). The critical appraisal instrument is accompanied by a user manual detailing What to consider, Where to look, and How to rate. Conclusions: We developed a ready-to-use, valid, and reliable critical appraisal instrument applicable to healthcare QI intervention publications, but recognize scope for continuing refinement.
机译:目标:有效,可靠的关键评估工具通过帮助利益相关者识别更高质量的研究来推进质量改进(QI)干预的影响。 QI方法多种多样,与临床干预措施不同。广泛使用的关键评估工具没有考虑到独特的QI功能,并且现有的QI工具(例如SQUIRE)用于发布指导,而不是关键评估。这项研究开发并通过心理测试方法测试了一种重要的评估工具,即质量改进最低质量标准集(QIMQCS),用于评估QI出版物的QI特定功能。方法:开发该工具和确保有效性的方法包括文献综述,现场和在线调查专家小组的意见以及对经验示例的应用。我们通过分析可靠性指标和项目认可率,研究了一系列QI出版物(N = 54)中的心理测量特性,并探讨了审阅者之间的分歧。结果:QIMQCS包括16个内容域以评估QI干预出版物:组织动机,干预理由,干预描述,组织特征,实施,研究设计,比较器描述,数据源,时间安排,坚持/忠诚,健康结果,组织准备情况,渗透率/覆盖率,可持续性,传播和局限性。 QIMQCS项目的评分者间协议中位数为kappa 0.57(同意率为83%)。项目统计数据表明有足够的能力区分出版物(中级质量标准达到67%)。内部一致性度量表明一致性,没有过多的概念重叠(绝对平均项目间相关度= 0.19)。关键评估工具随附有一个用户手册,其中详细说明了要考虑的内容,在哪里看以及如何进行评分。结论:我们开发了适用于医疗保健QI干预出版物的现成可用,有效且可靠的关键评估工具,但确认了继续完善的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号