首页> 外文OA文献 >Secure tenure for home ownership and economic development on land subject to native title
【2h】

Secure tenure for home ownership and economic development on land subject to native title

机译:在土地所有权的土地上确保土地所有权和经济发展的保有权

摘要

The public policy debate on land rights, the struggle of Indigenous peoples to have their pre-colonial possession of land recognised and interests in how land rights might be exercised to fulfil Indigenous peoples’ hopes for economic development and home ownership.Those people who have had their native title rights and interests in land legally recognised are contemplating the implications for their future prosperity. They are pondering the types of investments they can make to develop their land for social and economic purposes, the use and development rights they might temporarily exchange for income, or, as a last resort, the rights and interests they are prepared to relinquish in return for compensation.Western Australia (WA) presents a unique case in the Australian context because, unlike other states and the Northern Territory, WA does not have a statutory Aboriginal land rights system despite its large and remote Aboriginal population.What is termed ‘Aboriginal land’ in Western Australia covers approximately 12 per cent of the state but has generally been granted at the discretion of the Minister for Lands, or else is held in trust as a reserve for the ‘use and benefit of Aboriginal inhabitants’.1 This estate has not been transferred to Aboriginal ownership under state legislation on the basis of statutory rights conferred on Aboriginal people as the result of a formal claim based on their cultural connections to the land or waters.According to the former Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Tom Calma (AHRC 2005), this reflects ‘protection’ style legislation from the 19th century, which has been the basis of calls for reform of the system since the early 1980s (Seaman 1984; Bonner 1996; Casey 2007).
机译:关于土地权的公共政策辩论,土著人民争取在殖民地前占有土地的斗争以及对如何行使土地权利以实现土著人民对经济发展和住房所有权的希望的兴趣。他们的合法土地所有权和权益正在考虑对其未来繁荣的影响。他们正在考虑为社会和经济目的开发土地的投资类型,可能暂时将其交换使用权和开发权以换取收入,或者作为最后手段,他们准备放弃作为回报的权利和利益。西澳大利亚州(Western Australia,WA)在澳大利亚的情况下是一个独特的案例,因为与其他州和北领地不同,西澳大利亚州尽管拥有大量偏远的原住民,却没有法定的原住民土地权制度。 “在西澳大利亚州大约占该州的12%,但通常由土地部长决定是否授予,或者以信托形式被保留为“土著居民的使用和利益”。1根据原住民的正式诉求,根据赋予原住民的法定权利,未根据国家法律转移给原住民所有权与土地或水域的文化联系。根据前原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社会司法专员汤姆·卡尔玛(AHRC 2005),这反映了19世纪的“保护”式立法,这是呼吁对土地或水域进行改革的基础。自1980年代初以来的系统(Seaman 1984;邦纳(Bonner)1996;凯西(2007)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jonathan Taylor; Ed Wensing;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号