首页> 外文OA文献 >Spectral signature databases and their application/misapplication to modeling and exploitation of multispectral/hyperspectral data
【2h】

Spectral signature databases and their application/misapplication to modeling and exploitation of multispectral/hyperspectral data

机译:光谱签名数据库及其应用/误用于多光谱/高光谱数据的建模和利用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Spectral signature databases abound in the field of remote sensing. Scientists use these databases to assist in their analysis everyday. Many decisions are made about hyperspectral data and the observations made with this data based on the assumption that these databases contain “ground truth” representations of the signatures for materials sensed. For the most part, this is true if the team collecting the signatures that populate these databases follow sound practices when collecting this data. The data does, however, represent a very specific picture of the “truth”. Signatures found in databases represent a specific collection configuration or geometry. The source of illumination, whether it is artificial or natural, is in a very specific location as is the sensor used to collect radiance for the derivation of the reflectance signatures. A signature found in the database is useful for only a very specific scenario, one that matches the geometry used during ground truth collection. There are other very significant factors regarding illumination field and scattering properties of the material and reference standards that influence the computed reflectance signature. This work will illustrate some of the dramatic variation that can exist in the reflectance signatures derived for the same material using different techniques. Difference upward of 30% may exist for the same material. These observations are presented so that scientists who look to these databases in the future will consider very carefully the metadata that is presented with the signatures that they use to make sure they are applicable to the phenomenology and collection scenario that they have under study. These observations should also point out that signatures presented without detailed metadata could be very hazardous to use if the outcome of the analysis being performed relies upon the absolute reflectance spectra being known.
机译:光谱签名数据库在遥感领域比比皆是。科学家每天使用这些数据库来协助他们进行分析。关于高光谱数据以及根据这些数据进行的观察,基于这些数据库包含所感测材料的签名的“真实性”表示的假设,因此做出了许多决策。在大多数情况下,如果收集填充这些数据库的签名的团队在收集此数据时遵循正确的做法,那么这是正确的。但是,数据确实代表了“真相”的非常具体的描述。在数据库中找到的签名代表特定的集合配置或几何形状。照明源(无论是人工的还是自然的)都位于非常特定的位置,就像用于收集辐射度以导出反射率特征的传感器一样。在数据库中找到的签名仅适用于非常特定的情况,该情况与地面真相收集期间使用的几何形状相匹配。关于材料的照明场和散射特性以及参考标准,还有其他非常重要的因素会影响所计算的反射率特征。这项工作将说明在使用不同技术为同一材料得出的反射率签名中可能存在的一些戏剧性变化。同一材料可能存在30%的差异。提出这些观察结果的目的是为了将来使用这些数据库的科学家将非常仔细地考虑使用带有签名的元数据,以确保它们适用于所研究的现象学和收集场景。这些观察结果还应指出,如果执行的分析结果依赖于已知的绝对反射光谱,则没有详细元数据显示的签名可能非常危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号