首页> 外文OA文献 >Criminal Defence in China: The Possible Impact of the 1996 Criminal Procedural Law Reform
【2h】

Criminal Defence in China: The Possible Impact of the 1996 Criminal Procedural Law Reform

机译:中国刑事辩护:1996年刑事诉讼法改革的可能影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Criminal procedure in China had been governed by the 1979 Criminal Procedure Law (CPL 1979). This was amended in 1996 (the Amendment). The 1996 Amendment introduces an element of procedural justice into China’s criminal justice system. There are high expectations that the Amendment will better protect the rights of a suspect. The substantial improvement in the law and the symbolic values embodied in it are expected to provide an opportunity for such an improvement. However, given the ingrained pattern of practice in China’s criminal justice system, the practical impact of the Amendment in protecting the right to counsel will be limited. Efforts to amend the law will not give the rights real protection. Amending the CPL will not make the rights real unless they can be effectively enforced. While the Amendment may have laid a foundation for improvement, there is little likelihood that the legislation will bring about meaningful change in the practice of criminal defense in the near future.
机译:中国的刑事诉讼受到1979年《刑事诉讼法》(CPL 1979)的管辖。 1996年对此进行了修订(修订)。 1996年的修正案将程序正义的要素引入了中国的刑事司法系统。人们对该修正案将更好地保护犯罪嫌疑人的权利寄予厚望。法律的实质性改进和其中体现的象征性价值有望为这种改进提供机会。但是,鉴于中国刑事司法制度中根深蒂固的执业模式,该修正案在保护律师权方面的实际影响将是有限的。修改法律的努力不会给权利带来真正的保护。除非可以有效地执行,否则修改CPL不会使权利成为现实。尽管该修正案可能为改进奠定了基础,但该立法几乎不可能在不久的将来带来刑事辩护实践中有意义的变化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fu HL;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1998
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号