首页> 外文OA文献 >Check in the mail or more in the paycheck: does the effectiveness of fiscal stimulus depend on how it is delivered?
【2h】

Check in the mail or more in the paycheck: does the effectiveness of fiscal stimulus depend on how it is delivered?

机译:检查支票中的邮件或更多信息:财政刺激的有效性取决于交付方式吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent fiscal policies have aimed to stimulate household spending. In 2008, most households received one-time economic stimulus payments. In 2009, most working households received the Making Work Pay tax credit in the form of reduced withholding; other households, mainly retirees, received one-time payments. This paper quantifies the spending response to these different policies and examines whether the spending response differed according to whether the stimulus was delivered as a one-time payment or as a flow of payments in the form of reduced withholding. Based on responses from a representative sample of households in the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, the paper finds that the reduction in withholding led to a substantially lower rate of spending than the one-time payments. Specifically, 25 percent of households reported that the one-time economic stimulus payment in 2008 led them to mostly increase their spending while only 13 percent reported that the extra pay from the lower withholding in 2009 led them to mostly increase their spending. The paper uses several approaches to isolate the effect of the delivery mechanism from the changing aggregate and individual conditions. Responses to a hypothetical stimulus in 2009, examination of u201cfree responsesu201d concerning differing responses to the policies, and regression analysis controlling for individual economic conditions and demographics all support the primary importance of the income delivery mechanism in determining the spending response to the policies.
机译:最近的财政政策旨在刺激家庭支出。 2008年,大多数家庭获得了一次性的经济刺激付款。 2009年,大多数在职家庭以减少预提税的形式获得了“做工支付”税收抵免;其他家庭(主要是退休人员)获得了一次性付款。本文量化了对这些不同政策的支出响应,并根据刺激是一次性支付还是减少预扣的支付流,检验了支出响应是否有所不同。根据汤森路透/密歇根大学消费者调查的代表性家庭样本的反馈,该论文发现预扣税的减少导致支出率大大低于一次性付款。具体来说,有25%的家庭报告说,2008年的一次性经济刺激付款使他们大部分增加了支出,而只有13%的家庭报告说,2009年的预提税较低而产生的额外工资使他们大部分增加了支出。本文采用了几种方法来将交付机制的影响与不断变化的总体和个别条件区分开。 2009年对假设刺激的应对措施,对政策不同应对措施的审查,控制个别经济状况和人口统计的回归分析均支持收入分配机制在确定对政策的支出应对措施中的首要重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号