...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series >CHECK IN THE MAIL OR MORE IN THE PAYCHECK: DOES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FISCAL STIMULUS DEPEND ON HOW IT IS DELIVERED?
【24h】

CHECK IN THE MAIL OR MORE IN THE PAYCHECK: DOES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FISCAL STIMULUS DEPEND ON HOW IT IS DELIVERED?

机译:在邮件中进行检查,或者在工资中进行更多检查:财务刺激的有效性取决于交货方式吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent fiscal policies have aimed to stimulate household spending. In 2008, most households received one-time economic stimulus payments. In 2009, most working households received the Making Work Pay tax credit in the form of reduced withholding; other households, mainly retirees, received one-time payments. This paper quantifies the spending response to these different policies and examines whether the spending response differed according to whether the stimulus was delivered as a one-time payment or as a flow of payments in the form of reduced withholding. Based on responses from a representative sample of households in the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, the paper finds that the reduction in withholding led to a substantially lower rate of spending than the one-time payments. Specifically, 25 percent of households reported that the one-time economic stimulus payment in 2008 led them to mostly increase their spending while only 13 percent reported that the extra pay from the lower withholding in 2009 led them to mostly increase their spending. The paper uses several approaches to isolate the effect of the delivery mechanism from the changing aggregate and individual conditions. Responses to a hypothetical stimulus in 2009, examination of "free responses" concerning differing responses to the policies, and regression analysis controlling for individual economic conditions and demographics all support the primary importance of the income delivery mechanism in determining the spending response to the policies.
机译:最近的财政政策旨在刺激家庭支出。 2008年,大多数家庭获得了一次性的经济刺激付款。 2009年,大多数在职家庭以减少预提税的形式获得了“做工支付”税收抵免;其他家庭(主要是退休人员)获得了一次性付款。本文量化了对这些不同政策的支出响应,并根据刺激是一次性支付还是减少预扣的支付流,检验了支出响应是否有所不同。根据汤森路透/密歇根大学消费者调查的代表性家庭样本的答复,该论文发现预扣税的减少导致支出率大大低于一次性付款。具体而言,有25%的家庭报告说,2008年的一次性经济刺激付款使他们大部分增加了支出,而只有13%的家庭报告说,2009年的预提税较低所带来的额外工资使他们大部分增加了支出。本文采用了几种方法来将交付机制的影响与不断变化的总体和个别条件区分开。 2009年对假设刺激措施的应对措施,对政策不同应对措施的“自由应对措施”的审查以及针对个别经济状况和人口统计的回归分析均支持收入分配机制在确定对政策的支出应对措施中的首要重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Working Paper Series 》 |2010年第16246期| P.a1-a21-40| 共42页
  • 作者单位

    Federal Reserve Board 21st and C Street NW Washington DC 20551;

    rnDepartment of Economics University of Michigan 611 Tappan St Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220 and NBER;

    rnUniversity of Michigan Business School Room R5396 Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234 and NBER;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号