首页> 外文OA文献 >Learning Capitalism The Hard Way: Evidence From Germany's Reunification
【2h】

Learning Capitalism The Hard Way: Evidence From Germany's Reunification

机译:学习资本主义艰难之路:来自德国统一的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Communism in East Germany sought to dampen the effect of market forces on firm productivity for nearly 40 years. How did East German firms respond to the free market after being thrust into it in 1990? We use a formal learning model and German business survey data to analyze the lasting impact of this far-reaching treatment on the way firms in former East Germany predicted their own productivity relative to firms in former West Germany during the two decades since Reunification. We find in confirmation of our formal model's predictions, that Eastern firms forecast productivity less accurately, particularly in dynamic and uncertain markets, but that the gap gradually closed over 12 to 13 years. Second, by analyzing the direction of firm level errors in conjunction with contemporaneous market signals we find that, in the years immediately following Reunification, Eastern firms estimate the market's role as generally less potent than Western firm do, an observation consistent with overweighting experiences from the communist era; however, over roughly 14 years both converge to the same (incorrect) overestimate of the market's role on their productivity.
机译:东德共产主义试图抑制市场力量对企业生产力的影响近40年。在1990年进入自由市场后,东德公司如何应对自由市场?我们使用正式的学习模型和德国商业调查数据来分析这种深远的影响,对统一以来的二十年间,前东德的公司相对于前西德的公司预测自己的生产率的方式产生了持久的影响。我们证实了正式模型的预测,即东方公司预测的生产率较低,特别是在动态和不确定的市场中,但这种差距在12至13年内逐渐缩小。其次,通过分析企业水平错误的方向以及同期的市场信号,我们发现,在统一之后的几年中,东方企业估计市场的作用总体上不如西方企业有效,这一观察结果与来自西方企业的超重经验相一致。共产主义时代但是,在大约14年的时间里,两者都趋同于(不正确地)高估了市场对其生产力的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号