首页> 外文OA文献 >Securitization, Deregulation, Economic Stability, and Financial Crisis. Part II: Deregulation, the financial crisis, and policy implications
【2h】

Securitization, Deregulation, Economic Stability, and Financial Crisis. Part II: Deregulation, the financial crisis, and policy implications

机译:证券化,放松管制,经济稳定和金融危机。第二部分:放松管制,金融危机和政策影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study analyzes the trends in the financial sector over the past 30 years, and argues that unsupervised financial innovations and lenient government regulation are at the root of the current financial crisis and recession. Combined with a long period of economic expansion during which default rates were stable and low, deregulation and unsupervised financial innovations generated incentives to make risky financial decisions. Those decisions were taken because it was the only way for financial institutions to maintain market share and profitability. Thus, rather than putting the blame on individuals, this paper places it on an economic setup that requires the growing use of Ponzi processes during enduring economic expansion, and on a regulatory system that is unwilling to recognize (on the contrary, it contributes to) the intrinsic instability of market mechanisms. Subprime lending, greed, and speculation are merely aspects of the larger mechanisms at work. It is argued that we need to change the way we approach the regulation of financial institutions and look at what has been done in other sectors of the economy, where regulation and supervision are proactive and carefully implemented in order to guarantee the safety of society. The criterion for regulation and supervision should be neither Wall Streetu2019s nor Main Streetu2019s interests but rather the interests of the socioeconomic system. The latter requires financial stability if itu2019s to raise, durably, the standard of living of both Wall Street and Main Street. Systemic stability, not profits or homeownership, should be the paramount criterion for financial regulation, since systemic stability is required to maintain the profitability - and ultimately, the existence - of any capitalist economic entity. The role of the government is to continually counter the Ponzi tendencies of market mechanisms, even if they are (temporarily) improving standards of living, and to encourage economic agents to develop safe and reliable financial practices. - See also, Working Paper No. 573.1, 'Securitization, Deregulation, Economic Stability, and Financial Crisis, Part I: The Evolution of Securitization.'
机译:这项研究分析了过去30年中金融业的趋势,并指出,无监督的金融创新和宽松的政府监管是当前金融危机和衰退的根源。加上长期的经济扩张,在此期间违约率保持稳定且较低,放松管制和无监督的金融创新产生了做出有风险的金融决策的动机。之所以做出这些决定,是因为这是金融机构保持市场份额和盈利能力的唯一途径。因此,本文没有将责任归咎于个人,而是将其置于需要在持久的经济扩张中不断使用庞氏骗局的经济体制上,以及不愿意识到的监管体系(相反,它有助于实现)市场机制的内在不稳定。次级贷款,贪婪和投机只是更大的机制起作用的方面。有人认为,我们需要改变处理金融机构监管的方式,并研究在经济的其他部门所采取的措施,在这些部门中,为了确保社会安全,积极进行了监管,并认真执行这些监管措施。监管的标准既不是华尔街的利益也不是大街的利益,而是社会经济制度的利益。如果要持续提高华尔街和大街的生活水平,后者需要财务稳定。系统稳定,而不是利润或房屋所有权,应该是金融监管的首要标准,因为需要系统稳定来维持任何资本主义经济实体的盈利能力,并最终维持其存在。政府的作用是,即使市场机制正在(暂时)改善生活水平,也要继续抵制庞氏骗局的趋势,并鼓励经济主体发展安全可靠的金融惯例。 -另请参见第573.1号工作文件,“证券化,放松管制,经济稳定性和金融危机,第一部分:证券化的演变”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tymoigne Eric;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:03:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号