首页> 外文OA文献 >Cross-border group-taxation and loss-offset in the EU: An analysis for CCCTB (Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base) and ETAS (European Tax Allocation System)
【2h】

Cross-border group-taxation and loss-offset in the EU: An analysis for CCCTB (Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base) and ETAS (European Tax Allocation System)

机译:欧盟的跨境集团税收和损失抵消:对CCCTB(共同综合企业税基)和ETas(欧洲税收分配制度)的分析

摘要

The European Commission proposed to replace the currently existing Separate Accounting by an EU-wide tax system based on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). Besides the CCCTB, there is an alternative tax reform proposal, the European Tax Allocation System (ETAS). In a dynamic capital budgeting model we analyze the impacts of selected loss-offset limitations currently existing in the EU under both concepts on corporate crossborder real investments of MNE. The analyses show that replacing Separate Accounting by either concept can lead to increasing profitability due to cross-border loss compensation. However, if the profitability increases, the study indicates that the main criteria of decisions on location are the tax rate divergences within the EU Member States. High tax rate differentials in the Member States imply significant redistribution of tax payments under CCCTB and ETAS. The results clarify that in both reform proposals tax payment reallocations occur in favor of the holding. National loss-offset limitations and minimum taxation concepts in tendency lose their impact on the profitability under both proposals. However, we found scenarios in which national minimum taxation can encroach upon the group level, although in our model the minimum taxation's impacts seem to be slight. Moreover, we identify harmful paradoxes in ETAS due to the tax credit mechanism. Our results can contribute to the current discussion on corporate group tax harmonization within the EU and other economic zones, e.g. the US, and help to anticipate the tax effects of lossoffset restrictions under the respective tax systems.
机译:欧盟委员会提议以基于通用合并公司税基(CCCTB)的欧盟范围的税制取代当前的独立会计。除了CCCTB,还有另一种税收改革建议,即欧洲税收分配系统(ETAS)。在动态的资本预算模型中,我们分析了在两种概念下,欧盟当前存在的选定亏损抵消限制对跨国企业的公司跨境实际投资的影响。分析表明,由于跨境损失补偿,用这两个概念代替“独立会计”都可以提高盈利能力。但是,如果获利能力提高,则研究表明,决定选址的主要标准是欧盟成员国内部的税率差异。成员国中较高的税率差异意味着在CCTCB和ETAS下的税收分配将大量重新分配。结果表明,在两个改革提案中,都发生了有利于控股公司的税收重新分配。在这两个建议下,国家的抵消损失限制和最低征税概念在趋势上都失去了对盈利能力的影响。但是,尽管在我们的模型中,最低征税的影响似乎很小,但我们发现了国家最低征税会侵占群体的情况。此外,由于税收抵免机制,我们在ETAS中发现了有害的悖论。我们的结果将有助于当前有关欧盟和其他经济区(例如欧盟)内企业集团税收协调的讨论。美国,并有助于预计相应税收制度下损失抵销限制的税收影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号