首页> 外文OA文献 >No going back: Why we cannot restore Glass-Steagall's segregation of banking and finance
【2h】

No going back: Why we cannot restore Glass-Steagall's segregation of banking and finance

机译:不能回头:为什么我们无法恢复格拉斯 - 斯蒂格尔的银行和金融隔离

摘要

The purpose of the 1933 Banking Act-aka Glass-Steagall-was to prevent the exposure of commercial banks to the risks of investment banking and to ensure stability of the financial system. A proposed solution to the current financial crisis is to return to the basic tenets of this New Deal legislation. Senior Scholar Jan Kregel provides an in-depth account of the Act, including the premises leading up to its adoption, its influence on the design of the financial system, and the subsequent collapse of the Act's restrictions on securities trading (deregulation). He concludes that a return to the Act's simple structure and strict segregation between (regulated) commercial and (unregulated) investment banking is unwarranted in light of ongoing questions about the commercial banks' ability to compete with other financial institutions. Moreover, fundamental reform - the conflicting relationship between state and national charters and regulation - was bypassed by the Act.
机译:1933年《银行法》(又称《格拉斯-斯蒂格尔法》)的目的是防止商业银行承受投资银行业务的风险,并确保金融体系的稳定性。解决当前金融危机的一种建议方法是恢复该新政法规的基本宗旨。高级学者扬·克雷格尔(Jan Kregel)对该法案进行了深入的介绍,包括导致该法案通过的前提条件,该法案对金融系统设计的影响以及该法案对证券交易限制的取消(取消法规)。他的结论是,鉴于有关商业银行与其他金融机构竞争能力的持续质疑,没有必要恢复该法案的简单结构以及(受监管的)商业银行和(不受监管的)投资银行之间的严格隔离。此外,该法规避了根本性的改革,即州与国家宪章与法规之间相互矛盾的关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kregel Jan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号