首页> 外文OA文献 >Energy rebound as a potential threat to a low-carbon future: findings from a new exergy-based national-level rebound approach
【2h】

Energy rebound as a potential threat to a low-carbon future: findings from a new exergy-based national-level rebound approach

机译:能源反弹是对低碳未来的潜在威胁:基于新的以火用为基础的国家级反弹方法的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

150 years ago, Stanley Jevons introduced the concept of energy rebound: that anticipated energy efficiency savings may be “taken back” by behavioural responses. This is an important issue today because, if energy rebound is significant, this would hamper the effectiveness of energy efficiency policies aimed at reducing energy use and associated carbon emissions. However, empirical studies which estimate national energy rebound are rare and, perhaps as a result, rebound is largely ignored in energy-economy models and associated policy. A significant difficulty lies in the components of energy rebound assessed in empirical studies: most examine direct and indirect rebound in the static economy, excluding potentially significant rebound of the longer term structural response of the national economy. In response, we develop a novel exergy-based approach to estimate national energy rebound for the UK and US (1980–2010) and China (1981–2010). Exergy—as “available energy”—allows a consistent, thermodynamic-based metric for national-level energy efficiency. We find large energy rebound in China, suggesting that improvements in China’s energy efficiency may be associated with increased energy consumption (“backfire”). Conversely, we find much lower (partial) energy rebound for the case of the UK and US. These findings support the hypothesis that producer-sided economies (such as China) may exhibit large energy rebound, reducing the effectiveness of energy efficiency, unless other policy measures (e.g., carbon taxes) are implemented. It also raises the prospect we need to deploy renewable energy sources faster than currently planned, if (due to rebound) energy efficiency policies cannot deliver the scale of energy reduction envisaged to meet climate targets.
机译:150年前,斯坦利·杰文斯(Stanley Jevons)提出了能量回弹的概念:预期的节能效果可能会通过行为反应“收回”。今天,这是一个重要的问题,因为如果能量反弹显着,这将妨碍旨在减少能源使用和相关碳排放的能效政策的有效性。然而,估计国家能源回弹的实证研究很少,也许因此,在能源经济模型和相关政策中,回弹被忽略了。重大困难在于通过经验研究评估的能源回弹的组成部分:大多数研究静态经济的直接和间接回弹,不包括国民经济长期结构响应的潜在显着反弹。作为回应,我们开发了一种基于火用能量的新颖方法来估算英国和美国(1980-2010年)和中国(1981-2010年)的国家能源回弹。火用(作为“可用能量”)允许以一致的,基于热力学的指标衡量国家一级的能源效率。我们发现中国的能源反弹很大,这表明中国能源效率的提高可能与能源消耗的增加(“逆火”)有关。相反,对于英国和美国,我们发现能量回弹低得多。这些发现支持以下假设,即除非采取其他政策措施(例如碳税),否则生产国(例如中国)可能会出现大规模的能源反弹,从而降低了能源效率的有效性。如果(由于反弹)能效政策无法实现为实现气候目标所设想的节能规模,这也提高了我们需要比当前计划更快地部署可再生能源的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号